Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

McCown Not bad But Colston??

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by voodooido What's even more sad is our starting CB was covering Olsen! He got abused all game. True, but Browner wasn't covering him the whole time, but he certainly was abused when he did. Abused may even ...

Like Tree57Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2015, 06:05 PM   #1
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by voodooido View Post
What's even more sad is our starting CB was covering Olsen! He got abused all game.
True, but Browner wasn't covering him the whole time, but he certainly was abused when he did.

Abused may even be putting it delicately.
Danno is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:35 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 39,022
Blog Entries: 29
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

On the bright side... you can upgrade your season tickets next year...
SloMotion likes this.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:37 PM   #3
500th Post
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 590
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Browner can not be left on a island covering a speedy WR. He is not a shut down corner. Got to have a safety high with him. New England knew this and so did Seattle. They used his other strengths to help their defense. Unfortunately we don't do that here in New Orleans.
mleg1972 and Rell&Gold like this.
GeauxForMore is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:41 PM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 7,113
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by GeauxForMore View Post
Browner can not be left on a island covering a speedy WR. He is not a shut down corner. Got to have a safety high with him. New England knew this and so did Seattle. They used his other strengths to help their defense. Unfortunately we don't do that here in New Orleans.
Isn't that what RR gets paid for to figure out.
Danno likes this.
RailBoss is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:48 PM   #5
500th Post
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 590
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by RailBoss View Post
Isn't that what RR gets paid for to figure out.
My point exactly. Enough of this RR defense.
GeauxForMore is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:48 PM   #6
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: TEMPO VC Okefenokee Swamp
Posts: 1,985
Blog Entries: 2
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Colston should not be part of any 2 minute offense. This is getting predictable. Brees can no longer be blamed as Colston also crapped himself getting passes from McCown. Colston's fault. Sorry, but he is done. What good is a receiver when he can not catch.

As far as Browner goes, he is what he is. Blame the coaching staff. They should know what he is and play him and coach him up as such within the system of the defense. He did well within the system of Seattle b/c Seattle's defensive coaches were and are far superior than ours. So are New England's. It is what it is.
brees84 likes this.

"I'd far rather be happy than right any day" ~ Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy
"Honor: if you need it defined, you don't have it" ~ Ron Swanson
Barry from MS is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 03:49 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 39,022
Blog Entries: 29
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by Barry from MS View Post
Colston should not be part of any 2 minute offense. This is getting predictable. Brees can no longer be blamed as Colston also crapped himself getting passes from McCown. Colston's fault. Sorry, but he is done. What good is a receiver when he can not catch.

As far as Browner goes, he is what he is. Blame the coaching staff. They should know what he is and play him and coach him up as such within the system of the defense. He did well within the system of Seattle b/c Seattle's defensive coaches were and are far superior than ours. So are New England's. It is what it is.
Andy Tanner would be an improvement...
Boutte likes this.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 04:00 PM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,467
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

DLine is just hot garbage. No pass rush. Can't defend the run. Swann and Breaux have promise but the rest in the secondary are not good. Kikaha is a high motor guy but he's average at best when the Saints need good to great. Anthony has no help. Hope it doesn't stunt his potential.
K Major likes this.
Cruize is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 04:13 PM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,015
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by Cruize View Post
Anthony has no help. Hope it doesn't stunt his potential.
Good thing we have excellent LB coach... lol
dizzle88 likes this.
brees84 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 02:43 PM   #10
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mid City, New Orleans
Posts: 3,556
Re: McCown Not bad But Colston??

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx View Post
but who's defense is? name me one team that has ALL THE TANGIBLES you want in a defense?
Easy..Denver
dizzle88 likes this.
CharityMike is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/74338-mccown-not-bad-but-colston.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 09-27-2015 05:22 PM 3
McCown Not bad But Colston?? This thread Refback 09-27-2015 03:51 PM 4


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts