saintswhodi

Hey alsaints, did you miss this post? Gloss over it or what? Someone mentioned a relation between you and Gumbo BEFORE me. First post IMMEDIATELY after yours. But in your attempt to strike out against moonshiners you attack me again. Show me where I \"insulted you first\" and we can end this silly disagreement. As it stands you probably be . I don\'t care how you feel about me, but if you wanna come into that\'s not rude), , which I am sure you did. I am sorry disagree with your own opinions so much I make you have to go back what you said previously. Denotes I don\'t have that problem cause I am consistent in everything I say on here. we will get along famously. As for the rest of what you say, there\'s another term you should learn on here. :icon_bs:

[Edited on 13/2/2005 by saintswhodi]

[Edited on 13/2/2005 by saintswhodi]

I\'ve had about all this I\'m going to take!

[Edited on 13/2/2005 by JOESAM2002]

alsaints113

OK, this is the last time I am going to even bother replying to you if you are going to consistently react in such a manner to every post I make.

Yes, I saw that post but alas...I read turbo\'s post as joking sarcasm and actually laughed! I did however see that you were the only one to actually say Gumbo and I were the same person.

Anyhow, I am not singling you out. I apologize that I left the salutation from my original post at the top. If you notice, throughout the post I both refer to you and talk to you. Sorry I didn\'t get rid of that intro. It would have prevented some confusion.

Secondly, I do not have a me against the moonshiners attitude. I noticed in the last few posts I made people considered me a sunshiner so I made this thread as a joke. Unfortunately I should have known better since it\'s hard to tell when people are joking when reading type. I did not mean to come off as rude. I was just trying to get a laugh but I guess I am not well known enough in this forum yet for people to know that.

Thirdly (almost done), I think I have responded to all replies to my posts accordingly. I have felt I have had to defend mysefl in every thread this weekend. Whats a guy to do when the following happens:

1.) He replies in agreement to a post and then posts his own opinion
2.) He uses a comparison of why he doesn\'t think the disappointments put out by the Saints are as bad as one of his other teams....this one is for turbo_dog too
3.) He is said to be unreal, disappointing, his statemtns are read into too deep and assumptions made, outlandish, laughed at, fairweather fan, etc.

I feel I have replied accordingly.

Unfortunately I see that I may have actually insulted you first. I see I followed your first post with \"Miss Cleao\"...lol...and O\'Reilly jokes. To clarify, these were sarcastic remarks just meant to show how I felt you weree acting. Sorry if these initially bent you out of shape.

One last thing saintswhodi in reply to the following:

\"I am sorry you disagree with your own opinions so much I make you have to go back and spellcheck and recheck what you said previously. Denotes inconsistency in your statements, no?\"

There are no inconsistencies. I was making a simple point. When I read posts here (hasn\'t yet happened with my own), I notice people will reply in disagreement to someone by re-posting old posts by the person they are replying too. This is usually then followed by somebody being \"called 9out\" that they don\'t agree with their own statements. I am sure there are people on this site that completely agree with me here. I never actually go look at my old posts because I know what I mean.

OK thats all. Let\'s end this episode of Oprah :smile_argue:

JOESAM2002

The man said he was sorry! NOW DROP IT!!!!!!!

ScottyRo

I think at the end of Oprah eveyone is supposed to hug.

[Edited on 13/2/2005 by ScottyRo]

saintswhodi

It was dropped before he posted Joe but I got you.

Alsaints, it appears we BOTH got off on the wrong foot here. As my homie JKool points out, and as you did, it is easy to do such when trying to infer meaning from type. Kudos on the way you handled it. Sorry my initial remarks left you no cause but to respond to me in the manner you did. I aslo know what it is like when you feel several people are against you on the forum and you lash out. Truly, no hard feelings. I DID take your me against the moonshiners act seriously, and since you have explained that is incorrect on my end, I say my bad. It is just a matter of learning your style, and how to react to it. From here forward if you choose not to post to me, it\'s all good. I don\'t have a problem with that. But I now understand the misunderstanding for what it was, and am ready to simply forget it.

saintswhodi

Scotty, I know what kinda hugging you like, and it ends with songs like \"stuck in the middle with you,\" but with two guys. No thanks.

ScottyRo

There you go again...misinterpreting things.

saintswhodi

Hey, all I do is take the facts, and apply them. If you don\'t like it, don\'t say it. Unless you are saying JKool is actually a woman, or you thought as much when you posted that song to describe him and yourself, but I don\'t think Kool will agree with that. :P

alsaints113

OK this is weird....first we have an episode of Oprah and now its seemingly followed by an episode of Dr. Phil. Let\'s all spoon.

:niko_saddam: \"I love you\"

saintswhodi

More like Jerry Springer, and let\'s not spoon. IF that\'s okay with you Scotty? :P