|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; This may be interesting. Maybe not, but I think it will... Here's the deal. I've got each position listed both on offense and defense. Some positions are listed as a group, rather than being broken down individually. Let's grade each ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-22-2005, 01:20 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Grade the Saints!
This may be interesting. Maybe not, but I think it will...
Here's the deal. I've got each position listed both on offense and defense. Some positions are listed as a group, rather than being broken down individually. Let's grade each one on a scale from 1 to 10. With 10 being the highest. A 5 rating would mean the position is only adequete. Anything under 5 would be less than adequete and anything over 5 would be above average. I think we're clear on the grading system? I'll stick my neck on the chopping-block first! Offense: QB-7 WR-8 OG-6 OT-3 C-7 TE-5 RB-8 FB-6 Defense: MLB-5 SLB-5 WLB-5 DE-9 DT-5 CB-6 FS-5 SS-4 |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
02-22-2005, 02:02 AM | #2 |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 65
|
Grade the Saints!
Offense:
QB:8 WR:9 OG:4, 8 when Bently plays here OT:3 C:4 TE:5, -18 if blocking for Duece on third down. RB:9.6 FB:8 Defense: MLB:6, I like Watson SLB:4 WLB:5 DE:9 DT:4 CB:6 FS:2 Tesucky SS:6, My whole family agree that Jay actually isn\'t that bad in SS |
02-22-2005, 02:05 AM | #3 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,740
|
Grade the Saints!
Good idea...
Offense: QB-7 WR-8 OG-8 OT-4 C-7 TE-6 RB-9 FB-7 Defense: MLB-6 SLB-6 WLB-6 DE-10 DT-5 CB-6 FS-4 SS-4 |
02-22-2005, 03:14 AM | #4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Grade the Saints!
Offense:
QB-7 (Not great, not horrible) WR-7 (Solid, but depth is a concern) OG-5 (Fine but not impressive) OT-2 (Terrible) C-7 (Good, will be great) TE-6 (Off and on) RB-8 (Solid, but could improve even without a personel change) FB-7 (Good) Defense: MLB-5 (Good and will improve) SLB-1 (Horrible, not even a third stringer here) WLB-2 (Poor) DE-10 (Excellent) DT-5 (Mediocre, but serviceable) CB-7 (Can get the job done) FS-6 (Can get the job done, but depth is an issue) SS-5 (Could be higher than this if Bellamy ages well) Special Teams KR-5 (Could be stronger with a better supporting cast) PR-4 (Too gun shy this year, as with last year) K-7 (Good but aging) P-9 (Excellent) |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
02-22-2005, 08:46 AM | #5 |
500th Post
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 690
|
Grade the Saints!
Offense:
QB -- 6.5 (but really his rating from game to game swings from a 2-9) WR-8 OG-5 OT-3 C-7 TE-4 (based on their production last year) RB-8 FB-6 Defense: MLB-5 SLB-5 WLB-5 DE-9 DT-5 CB-5 FS-5 SS-4 |
02-22-2005, 09:00 AM | #6 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Grade the Saints!
.500
|
02-22-2005, 09:15 AM | #7 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,718
|
Grade the Saints!
Based on the whole unit, not just the starter?
Offense: QB -5 I rate Brooks a 7, but we have no one behind him WR-9 If Joe leaves, I\'d give it a 7. OG-7 No superstars, but I think we have 17 lineman who can also play guard OT-5 Gandy is OK, but declining. Riley is the Grady Jackson of RT\'s, part time production. C-9 We also have 17 linemen who have played center. Bentley will be an all-pro soon. TE-6 They had an off year, again. But they\'re OK. RB-7 McAllister is a 9, when fit. Stecker is a solid #2, but we have no #3. FB-8 This kid looks good, and Conwell and Hall can both play FB. Defense: MLB-6 Watson should be even better in 2005. Ruff a serviceable back-up. SLB-4 If the last 4 games were for real, I\'d give it a 6, but Hodge/Alen is pretty weak. WLB-4 We have a glut of WLB\'s. Good depth, but no standouts. Colby DE-10 We\'re loaded DT-5 We\'re not loaded. Young needs a 2-gapper next to him CB-7 If Brown continues to improve it could be an 8. Craft,Thomas,Ambrose provide good depth. FS-5 Tebucky is OK, but we could do better. No depth at all. SS-5 Bellamy is decent, but Mitchell should push him. Well it appears to me the main areas of weakness are SLB, WLB, RT, FS, SS, DT, QB (back-up). |
02-22-2005, 09:51 AM | #8 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Grade the Saints!
|
02-22-2005, 10:09 AM | #9 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
Grade the Saints!
[Edited on 22/2/2005 by Saint_LB] |
02-22-2005, 10:46 AM | #10 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,718
|
Grade the Saints!
Baby steps. |