|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Here\'s one of those \"what ifs\" What if the defense didn\'t get all those turnovers. They would have been on the field longer and might have finished 33rd in total defense. Things that make you say hmmmmmmmmmm............
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-25-2005, 09:18 PM | #91 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
Here\'s one of those \"what ifs\"
What if the defense didn\'t get all those turnovers. They would have been on the field longer and might have finished 33rd in total defense. Things that make you say hmmmmmmmmmm......... |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
02-25-2005, 09:44 PM | #92 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 517
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
Hahaha..that was pretty good...
|
02-25-2005, 11:08 PM | #93 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
Imagine how terrible the offense would be if the defense didn\'t give them 33 extra possessions to punt or turn the ball over?
|
02-26-2005, 02:35 AM | #94 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 517
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
But..Yes..We did rank 10th in takeaway\'s...and at the same time..ranked overall..Dead Last in the Defensive rankings... Quite an accomplishment...Venturi is a Genius.... |
02-26-2005, 02:43 AM | #95 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
Unlike those who throw up their hands and say \"worst ever, I quit\", I\'m trying to find where it was good, where it was bad and find solutions. I know that\'s a tough concept to master for the \"Mike Tyson\" type. (Unable to reason, pounds the same argument over and over, and calls anything contrary to his distorted view of reality \"ludicrous\".
Points allowed is the only measure by which one can truly say \"best\" or \"worst\" ever and the truly only meaningful category to compare across years, or even within a season. Since we weren\'t even close to the worst this year in that category (28th), assertions that this is the worst defense EVER is nonsense. The Bengals from 1991-2003 and the Bucs in 76 were probably the worst of all time. Someone is looking for rushing yards allowed in the 1st half. ---------------2004 Saints Defense Allowed ----------------Rushing---------------Passing ------------Wins-----Losses------Wins------Losses Game-------121-------167----------237---------252 1st Half------70---------77----------112---------158 2nd Half-----51---------89----------125----------94 As you can see here, the defense was significantly better against the run in wins, however, this is skewed because teams playing from behind usually pass more (and gain more ground per average play). When we were getting spanked in 5 blowout losses, teams ran more in the 2nd half and passed less. It seems that the real big problem is pass defense in the 1st half. That\'s where games seem to be decided early. Teams that beat us went downfield early and often. No matter how you slice it, pass defense was terrible. Was this due to bad schemes? was this due to inadequate pass rush? Was this due to deficient athletes? As someone bemoaned above that the Cards ran all over us and that\'s why we lost, well, 59 yards in the 1st half vs 157 in the second half, 118 in the 4th quarter alone. This is the same game where there were 2 redzone turnovers and the offense gave up a touchdown in the first half, then proceeded to disappear in the second half. Show me how leaving the D in 99 degree heat for 21.5 minutes of the 2nd half while ammassing only 2 first downs is an example of how they suck? The D kept the team in the game until it was worn out by heat and futility. This game the offense lost. |
Calvin: "I wish I was a Tiger."
Hobbes: "Common lament." |
|
02-26-2005, 03:08 AM | #96 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 517
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
\'\'As someone bemoaned above that the Cards ran all over us and that\'s why we lost, well, 59 yards in the 1st half vs 157 in the second half, 118 in the 4th quarter alone. \'\'
And that had absolutley nothing to do with it...right...it was the 2 turnovers and that alone that lost the game?... When your Defense gives up yards..and points so easily...you are forced to throw it..and you will get more turnovers..it\'s just bound to happen... How can a Defense that ranked near dead last...in nearly every single catagory...be given praise for \'\'Winning\'\'....or for even trying... I can\'t agree with it...i just can\'t...you can try as you will..to single out specific drives...or whatever..but..the numbers don\'t change..and neihter does the end result...8-8..32nd ranked Defense...arguabley..the worst in N.O. history..and arguabley..one of the worst ever in NFL history... 15th ranked Offense...Here\'s the key word..DESPITE...a failure of a Defensive Unit. They were on pace to break the record for the worst ever...EVER...how on Earth can you think they are not as bad as they looked? If everything was infact..a 50/50 kinda thing...the D would have been ranked 15 too..or..the Offense would have been ranked Dead Last...Neither are true... it\'s not as simple as...As the Offense goes..so goes the Defense..nor is it vice versa...each unit is responsible for thier OWN production.. The Offense did thier job...mind you..it wasn\'t a legendary effort..but..good enough...better than most... Defense..Dead Last....an analysis ..or whatever...isn\'t going to change it...you said you showed me how the Defense could have been ranked top 10...if you take away like..6 games...haha...I bet most Defenses would look better...with a time machine...until that happens,,,Reality will continue to be defined by the moment...and..facts will continue to be defined by the past... |
02-26-2005, 10:16 AM | #97 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
|
02-26-2005, 11:01 AM | #98 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
Some people are just stubborn.
http://www.blackandgold.net/site/mod...id=7623&page=1 And I will take my own advice and jump out of trying to explain AGAIN. |
02-26-2005, 01:09 PM | #99 |
Cold as Ice!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
|
02-26-2005, 01:11 PM | #100 |
Cold as Ice!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
|
2004 Defensive Performance not as bad as you thinnk
|