|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I was just poking fun. Lighten up dude! Having AB withdrawals? Maybe I shoulda I know Danno, that\'s why I was doing the same to you. I remember how you used to get your shots in during the AB wars. ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-01-2005, 11:15 AM | #11 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
BNB, you know I know VERY well how those debates went, that\'s why I excused myself from them, and see many others have done the same. It\'s all good. I was just getting Danno back for his shots at us. IT was nothing personal or anything. Just clowning around. Maybe I do have AB withdrawal. :seeingstars: I\'ll go now. :sulkoff: |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-01-2005, 11:21 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
JKool and Danno --
Here\'s the point I THINK both of you are missing. The OLB is left unaccouted for most of the time. They are free to roam the field and free-lance. It is, by far, the easiest position of all 3 linebackers. All you need is a guy who can run fast and tackle. He doesn\'t have to worry about much. The MLB, on the other hand, has to take on blockers, shed blocks, and get to the ball carrier. He must also be fast enough to cover in the passing game. It\'s much easier to find a good OLB than a MLB. Now, you keep on wanting to talk about these BIG linebackers whose only job it is to stuff the run. Well, hardly anyone is using those guys anymore! |
03-01-2005, 11:26 AM | #13 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
Billy, I think I accounted for that idea in my post above.
I\'m going to quote myself again:
|
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
03-01-2005, 11:31 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
Which one of these statements do you disagree with? 1. He has a little further to go at times to make plays but is often left unaccounted for in the blocking scheme. Many big play linebackers come from this position because they are allowed to freelance more and flow to the play with less traffic to fight through. 2. The WLB generally has fewer responsibilities than other front 7 positions. PS -- I\'m not the one saying this. Though, I totally agree with it. I got this from an article on the net. Do you disagree with those 2 statements? |
03-01-2005, 11:33 AM | #15 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
2, is the statement I disagree with.
[Edited on 1/3/2005 by JKool] |
03-01-2005, 11:36 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
Go read this article and tell me if your opinion is still the same. I think this is very interesting. Here\'s the link... http://www.redeyesports.com/Breakingdownadefense.htm |
03-01-2005, 11:45 AM | #17 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
Billy, that is just the article you quoted from, and I read what you wrote above.
I\'ve made two arguments regarding \"importance\" of the MLB - one where I said that he didn\'t have as many responsibilities (and while that may depend on what the MLB is asked to do in the passing game, I have suggested that MLBs are often the first off the field in passing situations - while that may not be true for Urlacher and Lewis, for MOST NFL teams it is true), and one where I tried to decide what you meant by important. I will ask you to respond to one or both of those, now that I\'ve read this whole article for you (which by the way was pretty good). Here is a quote that I found interesting about the MLB from your article:
I\'ve made my arguments, and this article has not persuaded me that any of them are wrong. |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
03-01-2005, 11:46 AM | #18 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
PS - Having fewer responsibilities with respect to blockers on running plays is not the same as having fewer responsibilities, but I made that argument above as well.
|
03-01-2005, 11:46 AM | #19 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
|
03-01-2005, 11:52 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Saints' linebackers (all of 'em)
The OLB doesn\'t have to take on blocks like a MLB does. You already said you agree the OLB is free to roam the field. And the author of the article said the samething. So, in essence, the MLBs job is the harder of the two. Keep this in mind. The OLB has to support the run and the pass. But, because he is left unaccounted for as compared to the SLB and MLB, it\'s much easier for him to do that. And for the last time.... Most MLB do not come off the field on 3rd down. Unless a team has someone like Orlando Ruff who is too slow to cover a runningback or a TE. It\'s a moot point, JKool. |