![]() |
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Quote:
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Quote:
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
This team has bigger issues than WR, I'm all for drafting one BUT only after drafting defense and Oline the first few rounds
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Quote:
If Tread would fall to the 2nd (highly unlikely), I'd be interested but not @ pick 12 :p. |
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Quote:
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Quote:
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
I think big bodied sure handed WR's that run 4.62 aren't typically drafted at pick #12.
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Don't put to much stock into the 40 times. ESPN or someone did an article not long ago about 40 times. Most Hall of Famers were not even tops in the 40's in their draft class.
Either you can play football or you can't. |
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
It's one of the most overrated things in sports, if 40 times mattered than the Raidiers would be 5 time champs by now
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
I wouldn't hate taking Treadwell at 12, but it wouldn't be the pick I would make if it were up to me. I'd rather continue to beef up that D line. Everyone says we need Colston's replacement, but he's more or less been a big non factor for the past 2 seasons for sure, and we've gotten along just fine without his former production. That's my two one hundredths of a dollar.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com