|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Colston was listed as a TE/WR project much different than Treadwell who's being talked up as the #1 WR in this class...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Hou Saints Fan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Colston was listed as a TE/WR project much different than Treadwell who's being talked up as the #1 WR in this class
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,589
|
Re: Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh!
Originally Posted by RaginCajun83
Not sure what your point is. All I'm saying is that I dont care what his 40 yard time is. You dont have to be a burner to be a #1WR. Colston wasnt. That being said, I'd rather we go defense at 12, but I wouldnt be disappointed if we used the pick for Treadwell.![]()
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/77376-laquon-treadwell-pro-day-4-63-40-ugh.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 03-28-2016 02:41 PM | 6 |
Laquon Treadwell pro day... 4.63 40? Ugh! | This thread | Refback | 03-28-2016 02:22 PM | 2 |