So a scout said Peat was not a good pick

Beastmode · 04-26-2016, 11:38 PM

OL, a lot of factors. One, they have to work as a complete unit, really gel together and that takes time. Also a young man, he'll get there. He did good, not great but I could see him turning the corner this year. He'll probably get so good we can't afford him at some point.

lee909 · 04-27-2016, 12:55 AM

I wanted Peters but after the coaches and front office made su much noise on getting the problem children out the locker room it was never happening

QBREES9 · 04-27-2016, 01:17 AM

Another expert, Wrong!

burningmetal · 04-27-2016, 04:59 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

Its his 1st freaking year
He player LT all his life
He was late getting into camp per NFL rules
Was asked to play RT (completely different footwork)

Give the guy a break.

Its like saying we're gonna lose a game because our opening KO went out of bounds.

Again, I know he was a rookie. Even rookies (when they are drafted that high) should be expected to show more potential than others. Nothing I saw impressed me. If we're arguing whether he was a good choice or not (which we are) then he hasn't done anything to suggest he was a good pick at this point, in my opinion. No offense to you, but I just don't buy the excuse of playing RT instead of LT. RT is less demanding. If we're nit picking about footwork, then he has no business being in this league. That's just not a good enough reason. I hope he comes around, but my opinion of him before he played a down with the Saints was that he was too soft for this level.

burningmetal · 04-27-2016, 05:10 AM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Defend the pick or don't. Chances are you're probably wrong.

Tell me what other rookie picked between Peat and Anthony had a remarkable first NFL season.

You don't have to have a remarkable first season. It's just slightly more convenient when they don't suck.

saintsfan1976 · 04-27-2016, 07:07 AM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

I'll say this though, I'd have no problem taking Conklin, none whatsoever...

Knew you'd come around

saintsfan1976 · 04-27-2016, 07:08 AM

Originally Posted by burningmetal

You don't have to have a remarkable first season. It's just slightly more convenient when they don't suck.

Peat didn't suck. He played THREE offensive line position in his first season.

jeanpierre · 04-27-2016, 07:42 AM

Yeah, jury is still out on Peat; but for a high first round pick, he pretty much sucked it...

Seems like those selections from those Pac/West Schools on their own schedule get off to slow starts...

Cooks did well, but most seem to be affected with missing those early OTAs and minicamps...

Imagine that, rookies missing practice early struggle...

SapperSaint · 04-27-2016, 08:26 AM

It is very hard to trust some of our scouts.

AllSaints · 04-27-2016, 08:44 AM

I judge draft picks after year 2.... Then you can really tell if they have improved and look like they will continue to improve... or if they are a "bust"

04-26-2016, 11:38 PM	#31
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick OL, a lot of factors. One, they have to work as a complete unit, really gel together and that takes time. Also a young man, he'll get there. He did good, not great but I could see him turning the corner this year. He'll probably get so good we can't afford him at some point.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

04-27-2016, 12:55 AM	#32
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,829 Blog Entries: 1	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick I wanted Peters but after the coaches and front office made su much noise on getting the problem children out the locker room it was never happening

04-27-2016, 01:17 AM	#33
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Another expert, Wrong!

04-27-2016, 04:59 AM	#34
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Originally Posted by Danno Its his 1st freaking year He player LT all his life He was late getting into camp per NFL rules Was asked to play RT (completely different footwork) Give the guy a break. Its like saying we're gonna lose a game because our opening KO went out of bounds. Again, I know he was a rookie. Even rookies (when they are drafted that high) should be expected to show more potential than others. Nothing I saw impressed me. If we're arguing whether he was a good choice or not (which we are) then he hasn't done anything to suggest he was a good pick at this point, in my opinion. No offense to you, but I just don't buy the excuse of playing RT instead of LT. RT is less demanding. If we're nit picking about footwork, then he has no business being in this league. That's just not a good enough reason. I hope he comes around, but my opinion of him before he played a down with the Saints was that he was too soft for this level.
	If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.

04-27-2016, 05:10 AM	#35
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Defend the pick or don't. Chances are you're probably wrong. Tell me what other rookie picked between Peat and Anthony had a remarkable first NFL season. You don't have to have a remarkable first season. It's just slightly more convenient when they don't suck.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-27-2016, 07:07 AM	#36
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,847 Blog Entries: 3	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Originally Posted by jeanpierre I'll say this though, I'd have no problem taking Conklin, none whatsoever... Knew you'd come around

04-27-2016, 07:08 AM	#37
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,847 Blog Entries: 3	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Originally Posted by burningmetal You don't have to have a remarkable first season. It's just slightly more convenient when they don't suck. Peat didn't suck. He played THREE offensive line position in his first season.

04-27-2016, 07:42 AM	#38
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick Yeah, jury is still out on Peat; but for a high first round pick, he pretty much sucked it... Seems like those selections from those Pac/West Schools on their own schedule get off to slow starts... Cooks did well, but most seem to be affected with missing those early OTAs and minicamps... Imagine that, rookies missing practice early struggle...

04-27-2016, 08:26 AM	#39
SapperSaint Pink Nightmare Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 3,028 Blog Entries: 7	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick It is very hard to trust some of our scouts.

04-27-2016, 08:44 AM	#40
AllSaints Breakin Records Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Deville, Louisiana Posts: 2,167	Re: So a scout said Peat was not a good pick I judge draft picks after year 2.... Then you can really tell if they have improved and look like they will continue to improve... or if they are a "bust"

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/77739-so-scout-said-peat-not-good-pick.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	04-26-2016 04:40 PM	17
So a scout said Peat was not a good pick	This thread	Refback	04-26-2016 04:38 PM	9