|
|||||||
Tom Condon: Saints seem satisfied with Drew Brees’ cap number
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'd have more faith and confidence in the Payton offensive system than I do in an aging Brees... Wouldn't pay more than 20 per... Breaking all the passing records is nice for, him, but, what does it do for our ...
28Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-12-2016, 06:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Tom Condon: Saints seem satisfied with Drew Brees’ cap number
I'd have more faith and confidence in the Payton offensive system than I do in an aging Brees...
Wouldn't pay more than 20 per... Breaking all the passing records is nice for, him, but, what does it do for our Lombardi count? |
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 06:58 PM
|
#2 |
|
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,761
|
Re: Tom Condon: Saints seem satisfied with Drew Brees’ cap number
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Great point. I've often wondered how much of Brees' success is due to Sean Payton and converseley how much of our offensive success is because Sean has Brees as his QB.
Obviously the answer is a ratio of both, but throughout Sean's coaching career he's made every QB he's ever coached look good. Could Sean take another "good" young ascending QB and turn him into a "great" one like he did with Brees? I'm kinda excited about seeing that happen, although kinda scared that it won't. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
«
Depth Chart May 2016
|
ESPN Triplett: Saints' top three draft picks from 2015 might all switch positions
»
Hybrid Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/77957-tom-condon-saints-seem-satisfied-drew-brees-cap-number.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Tom Condon: Saints seem satisfied with Drew Brees’ cap number | This thread | Refback | 05-11-2016 07:07 PM | 2 |
| The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 05-11-2016 05:58 PM | 4 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.
