|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Would Josh McCown be affordable as a back up? McCown: Josh McCown is an athletically gifted, but many questions remain unanswered regarding his ability as a player. With a much better than average arm, McCown can make all the throws ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-06-2005, 05:08 PM | #1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
What is wrong with this?
Would Josh McCown be affordable as a back up?
McCown:
Does anyone have any idea what kind of contract he might command? If it is within a $100,000ish of Bouman, wouldn't that be a serious upgrade at our 2nd spot? |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-06-2005, 05:12 PM | #2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
What is wrong with this?
Is he not under contract? If he is available, he would def be an upgrade over Bouman IMO, even though I would still prefer Mike McMahon.
|
03-06-2005, 05:16 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
What is wrong with this?
McCown is a RFA, but I\'d part with a 6th rounder (maybe even a 5th for him).
McMahon:
Link: http://scout.scout.com |
03-06-2005, 05:18 PM | #4 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
What is wrong with this?
Yeah, but they can take this line from McCown\'s write up:
|
03-06-2005, 05:27 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
What is wrong with this?
I suppose I\'m not sold on McMahon yet. I\'m also pretty sure that Kingsbury and Finlen are upgrades over Bouman.
It just seems to me that McCown has fewer problems and is less of a risk. He also doesn\'t appear suffer from a case of the \"being like the guy we have in may frustrating ways.\" It has been suggested we take O\'Sullivan back for a sixth; I think McCown is a better bet. |
03-06-2005, 05:35 PM | #6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
What is wrong with this?
Josh McCown could put pressure on Brooks and Hasbeen aint gonna want that .Hasbeen will most likely take a token QB in the draft and say he has addressed the position . |
03-06-2005, 05:39 PM | #7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
What is wrong with this?
There have been a few rumors of Saints trading AB. Perhaps Haz has become less enamored with him? With McCarthy gone, perhaps Haz will listen to arguments concerning AB as our future QB? I don\'t think it is impossible that we would consider McCown; of course, I\'m not going to get my hopes up for that.
|
03-06-2005, 07:11 PM | #8 |
Cold as Ice!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
|
What is wrong with this?
we really, really need to upgrade our 2nd string QB. Either Mcown or Mcmahon would be a great pick up. even warner would be huge!
|
03-07-2005, 09:05 AM | #9 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
What is wrong with this?
Uh, J? Not sure you read that thing on McCown, but try again. I\'ve done this before just to make a point, but read it like this...
\"[Aaron Brooks] is an athletically gifted, but many questions remain unanswered regarding his ability as a player. With a much better than average arm, [Brooks] can make all the throws necessary to play in the NFL. He has been inconsistent at the professional level...\" You get the point. Why sign baby Brooks? Do the same with McMahon and you have to wonder about either of them. I\'d probably entertain any QB who can compete at least for a backup role, but I don\'t know if these guys solve the problem long term. |
\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse
\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\" |
|
03-07-2005, 09:51 AM | #10 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
What is wrong with this?
I think the QB position you deal with last order of buisness. Its not a need. You have the number one guy in Brooks you have a vet in Bouman and you have 2 number 3 guys you take a chance and develop either to end up being a number two guy or gets good enough to take over the number one spot one day or becomes trade bait.
You don\'t want to go out and get a guy you are going to pay a chunk of change to ride the bench, especially when you have a year coming up where you are going to have to deal with some tough cap decisions. |
E U P H O R I A
|
|