![]() |
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Leadership role.
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
Quote:
If we had receivers that had issues like Bryant from Pittsburgh or Gordon from Cleveland, then I could see the need. But has anyone seen anything from our receiver corps other than coming to work and producing? What's this thought on the supposed leadership deficit? I really don't understand where this is coming from. SFIAH |
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
We sent vincent Brown to IR so we signed another veteran to fill his spot. If we desperately needed a WR to play and give leadership, boldin would have been signed. |
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Keep in mind folks, Brandon Coleman isn't actually that good. He had a couple of drops in practice today. The competition for the 4th WR spot and potentially a 5th spot if we keep 5 is likely wide open.
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
SFIAH |
Re: Saints Sign Hakeem Nicks
Quote:
There's no real production issue. Cooks, Sneed, and Coleman accounted for half the yards and 40% of the completions and passing TDs that the team had last year. The 5th WR has to play on special teams. That means it's likely to be a young guy, not a vet. Now maybe there is someone out there that can outplay Coleman. I'm presuming we all agree that Thomas will occupy the 3rd slot behind Cooks and Sneed. So there's this call for the pressing need to fill the 4th WR position? What exactly is so urgent about that? SFIAH |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com