who would you guys like

TayTay · 03-21-2005, 06:29 PM

Jammal Brown without a doubt.
If we we could have a solid RT (Brown) and move Mayberry to guard our O-Line would dominate.

rAge · 03-21-2005, 09:42 PM

Ruud can be had in the 2nd. Taking him in the 1st would be a bigger reach than Sullivan was two years ago.

I know you\'re joking, right?

Uh, no? Ruud is not highly rated. Most have him as a 2nd rounder, at best.

bignic26 · 03-21-2005, 09:51 PM

If baronm were in charge of the draft our draft class would consist of nothing but LBs. He would trade our #1, #3 this year and another #1 next year to the Bucs for this years #5 overall pick. New Orleans is now on the clock.....The Saints select Barrett Ruud Linebacker from Nebraska. Imagine the look on Kiper\'s face when he hears this one. He might retire just because of that pick.

turbo_dog · 03-21-2005, 10:00 PM

Barrett Ruud is projected by most as a 2nd rounder. I think he could be a really good pickup there.

What I don\'t get is why everyone wants to move Watson and get ANOTHER rookie MLB to replace him. Watson showed many signs of becoming a GOOD MLB. Sure he was out of position sometimes, but he was a rookie. I could see moving him if we were getting Ray Lewis or Urlacher or Hartwell (Oh, he\'s not good enough for us though, according to our decision makers). But the fact is that we aren\'t getting someone like that, so we should leave Watson there and let him be our general, until he proves he can\'t.

baronm · 03-21-2005, 11:06 PM

bignic, if I had my way we would draft smart players...and leave the guys with questionable instincts and inconsistent play alone.

Lkelley-i hope your right because I think we are going either OT or DT in the first round...and if we go DT I hope to God that player comes from USC and not florida state or Georgia.
I actually agree that that could happen..but if dallas goes for merriman...but I think new england will grab Ruud 32 if he\'s there...which leaves blackstock and burnett and we keep Watson at MLB. Burnett, even with injuries, is a hell of a football player and would be an absolute steal in the second or third.

Luis castillo, a DT is getting my attention in the second..and wesley britt or munoz could be had in the third, fourth, or fifth...so I don\'t really want to go those positions in the first. I think Britt will be just as good as the guys taken in the first.

I think that Leflors and a Rb (moats or barber later in the draft would be nice too..but the question was who do you like in the first and even though he\'s a stretch...he\'s the safest pick I can think of..a good character guy and a smart football player-excatly what we need on our defense..A LEADER.

The only other guy who might be there when we draft that I might want is either of the USC D-lineman or Heath miller..though I\'m kinda concerned he will be a boo type te and we need a more complete tight end.

LKelley67 · 03-21-2005, 11:20 PM

as for what i think the fo will do...

jammal brown is a real possibility if available.

after him maybe travis johnson when it is seen what condition bubblebutt is in.

i think they might go corner. pacman and rolle all but gone at #16 but rogers or miller wouldnt be out of line valuewise.

duece4pres · 03-22-2005, 02:31 AM

Aaron Rogers

Danno · 03-22-2005, 07:21 AM

Barrett Ruud is projected by most as a 2nd rounder. I think he could be a really good pickup there.

What I don\'t get is why everyone wants to move Watson and get ANOTHER rookie MLB to replace him. Watson showed many signs of becoming a GOOD MLB. Sure he was out of position sometimes, but he was a rookie. I could see moving him if we were getting Ray Lewis or Urlacher or Hartwell (Oh, he\'s not good enough for us though, according to our decision makers). But the fact is that we aren\'t getting someone like that, so we should leave Watson there and let him be our general, until he proves he can\'t.

Good point. I like Ruud, but he is basically the same slightly slower version of Watson so it really doesn\'t make sense. I\'d prefer to go OLB.
I remember I liked Dansby last year and everyone said he was a late 1st. Sixteen was too high. Well maybe it was, but I\'d like to have Dansby right now, along with keeping Howard and Watson.

baronm · 03-22-2005, 10:13 AM

I really wanted dansby last year....Travis johnson will be a bust...I don\'t want players whose bio says off the field problems and marked inconsistency geti just gets worse in new orleans.

03-21-2005, 06:29 PM	#11
TayTay 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 118	who would you guys like Jammal Brown without a doubt. If we we could have a solid RT (Brown) and move Mayberry to guard our O-Line would dominate.
TayTay 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 118

03-21-2005, 09:42 PM	#12
rAge 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 320	who would you guys like Ruud can be had in the 2nd. Taking him in the 1st would be a bigger reach than Sullivan was two years ago. I know you\'re joking, right? Uh, no? Ruud is not highly rated. Most have him as a 2nd rounder, at best.
rAge 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 320

03-21-2005, 09:51 PM	#13
bignic26 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 122	who would you guys like If baronm were in charge of the draft our draft class would consist of nothing but LBs. He would trade our #1, #3 this year and another #1 next year to the Bucs for this years #5 overall pick. New Orleans is now on the clock.....The Saints select Barrett Ruud Linebacker from Nebraska. Imagine the look on Kiper\'s face when he hears this one. He might retire just because of that pick.
bignic26 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 122

03-21-2005, 10:00 PM	#14
turbo_dog 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,592	who would you guys like Barrett Ruud is projected by most as a 2nd rounder. I think he could be a really good pickup there. What I don\'t get is why everyone wants to move Watson and get ANOTHER rookie MLB to replace him. Watson showed many signs of becoming a GOOD MLB. Sure he was out of position sometimes, but he was a rookie. I could see moving him if we were getting Ray Lewis or Urlacher or Hartwell (Oh, he\'s not good enough for us though, according to our decision makers). But the fact is that we aren\'t getting someone like that, so we should leave Watson there and let him be our general, until he proves he can\'t.

03-21-2005, 11:06 PM	#15
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	who would you guys like bignic, if I had my way we would draft smart players...and leave the guys with questionable instincts and inconsistent play alone. Lkelley-i hope your right because I think we are going either OT or DT in the first round...and if we go DT I hope to God that player comes from USC and not florida state or Georgia. I actually agree that that could happen..but if dallas goes for merriman...but I think new england will grab Ruud 32 if he\'s there...which leaves blackstock and burnett and we keep Watson at MLB. Burnett, even with injuries, is a hell of a football player and would be an absolute steal in the second or third. Luis castillo, a DT is getting my attention in the second..and wesley britt or munoz could be had in the third, fourth, or fifth...so I don\'t really want to go those positions in the first. I think Britt will be just as good as the guys taken in the first. I think that Leflors and a Rb (moats or barber later in the draft would be nice too..but the question was who do you like in the first and even though he\'s a stretch...he\'s the safest pick I can think of..a good character guy and a smart football player-excatly what we need on our defense..A LEADER. The only other guy who might be there when we draft that I might want is either of the USC D-lineman or Heath miller..though I\'m kinda concerned he will be a boo type te and we need a more complete tight end.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-21-2005, 11:20 PM	#16
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	who would you guys like as for what i think the fo will do... jammal brown is a real possibility if available. after him maybe travis johnson when it is seen what condition bubblebutt is in. i think they might go corner. pacman and rolle all but gone at #16 but rogers or miller wouldnt be out of line valuewise.

03-22-2005, 02:31 AM	#17
duece4pres Biloxi Bandit Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: biloxi, ms Posts: 293	who would you guys like Aaron Rogers

03-22-2005, 07:21 AM	#18
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	who would you guys like Barrett Ruud is projected by most as a 2nd rounder. I think he could be a really good pickup there. What I don\'t get is why everyone wants to move Watson and get ANOTHER rookie MLB to replace him. Watson showed many signs of becoming a GOOD MLB. Sure he was out of position sometimes, but he was a rookie. I could see moving him if we were getting Ray Lewis or Urlacher or Hartwell (Oh, he\'s not good enough for us though, according to our decision makers). But the fact is that we aren\'t getting someone like that, so we should leave Watson there and let him be our general, until he proves he can\'t. Good point. I like Ruud, but he is basically the same slightly slower version of Watson so it really doesn\'t make sense. I\'d prefer to go OLB. I remember I liked Dansby last year and everyone said he was a late 1st. Sixteen was too high. Well maybe it was, but I\'d like to have Dansby right now, along with keeping Howard and Watson.

03-22-2005, 10:13 AM	#19
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	who would you guys like I really wanted dansby last year....Travis johnson will be a bust...I don\'t want players whose bio says off the field problems and marked inconsistency geti just gets worse in new orleans.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954