![]() |
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
John Ross
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk |
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk |
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
I keep reading and looking for the argument to make me second guess my man crush on OJ Howard. Heck I would be happy if I can find one to make me entertain the thought. I am still stuck on Howard.
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
Saying he is somewhat passive. Likely a great target and a weak blocker like someone else I'm thinking. |
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Christian McCaffrey
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Robinson would take over at RT making Strief the swing guy again. Worse things could happen and the OLine would be set for many years. But, unless Watson is there, they have to go defense or trade down if Watson is there and an offer comes in too good to pass up.
|
Re: If you had to go Offense at #11...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com