![]() |
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
Both of them are fine prospects and I'd be fine with either one, but Adams may be the next Ed Reed only better. Do you pass up what many consider a 10 year all-pro prospect just because of need? Drafting for need is a huge mistake. |
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Quote:
But I'd have no problem with any of those three at #11. I'd just prefer Adams even though its not a glaring need. |
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
To me its similar to the freakish scenario of Jonathan Allen dropping to 11 (yeah I know, NFW).
Even though a stud 3-tech isn't a need for us in 2017, do you pass up what many think might be Warren Sapp talent just because you have some decent guys already on the roster? Just food for thought. Those decisions are way above my pay grade. |
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
We are not getting any LSU players. For that to happen Sandra Bullocks would have to make Blind Side II and his dream would have to be to play for the Saints.
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
What about Solomon Thomas at 11? I think he will be a perfect fit as well.
|
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Damn... Talk about great. He makes every freaking tackle on that video. :shock:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com