Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Snead?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Snead was never a lock to be a WR 2. His role is in the slot and Thomas is the redzone's number one target; Ginn is the deep threat. Both have the best chance to get TDs. Snead has less ...

Like Tree23Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2017, 07:35 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,276
Re: Snead?

Snead was never a lock to be a WR 2. His role is in the slot and Thomas is the redzone's number one target; Ginn is the deep threat. Both have the best chance to get TDs. Snead has less unless he gets faster. He's just not looked at in the redzone unless Thomas is accounted for by defenses(Denver game last year).
WillSaints81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 02:44 AM   #2
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 View Post
Snead was never a lock to be a WR 2. His role is in the slot and Thomas is the redzone's number one target; Ginn is the deep threat. Both have the best chance to get TDs. Snead has less unless he gets faster. He's just not looked at in the redzone unless Thomas is accounted for by defenses(Denver game last year).
Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.
Utah_Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2017, 01:27 PM   #3
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,133
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint View Post
Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.
Snead is a possession receiver like Lance Moore. He has a role and almost had 1000 yards last year. I like him a lot!
Thirty3 likes this.
Rugby Saint II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 12:25 PM   #4
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,276
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint View Post
Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.
Comparing Cooks incompletions to Snead's is comparing apples to oranges.
WillSaints81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 01:28 PM   #5
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 View Post
Comparing Cooks incompletions to Snead's is comparing apples to oranges.
I didn't compare incompletions. I compared 1st down %. I was showing that Snead has been an outstanding possession receiver when it comes to getting first downs and extending drives. My point being, Snead is an excellent #2 receiver. His stats as the third option were better that most team's second option.

Both receivers have good completion percentages. Cooks 66.6%, Snead 69.4% last season.

I'm curious though, why would you say it's comparing apples to oranges?
jeanpierre likes this.
Utah_Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2017, 10:18 PM   #6
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,276
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint View Post
I didn't compare incompletions. I compared 1st down %. I was showing that Snead has been an outstanding possession receiver when it comes to getting first downs and extending drives. My point being, Snead is an excellent #2 receiver. His stats as the third option were better that most team's second option.

Both receivers have good completion percentages. Cooks 66.6%, Snead 69.4% last season.

I'm curious though, why would you say it's comparing apples to oranges?
Because Cooks was not a possession receiver and many of us thought he would be good in the slot over Colston in 2015. The saints just would not use him in that manner. I'm not sure, was Snead on the field with Colston in 2015 in plays or did they rotate?
WillSaints81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2017, 07:49 PM   #7
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
Re: Snead?

He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.
Beastmode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 02:26 PM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Metairie
Posts: 1,129
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by Beastmode View Post
He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.
This is just not true. Maybe not the quickest guy, but certainly Rice had solid top end speed. In his prime he was the NFLs premier deep threat and I never remember him getting caught from behind.
K Major likes this.
billyt81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 02:44 PM   #9
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,797
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by billyt81 View Post
This is just not true. Maybe not the quickest guy, but certainly Rice had solid top end speed. In his prime he was the NFLs premier deep threat and I never remember him getting caught from behind.
Precisely.

I remember reading a book by Bill Walsh (Building a Champion). He spoke of how in his scouting (MS Valley State) of Jerry, what separated him from most was his stride and second gear. He had never seen that type of gear in all of his days of scouting receivers . In the open field his long stride gave him functional speed to distant himself from defenders. At the same exact starting point, you never saw Rice get caught from behind. Not once.

He was far from slow.
73Saint and Beastmode like this.
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 06:27 PM   #10
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Bradenton,FL
Posts: 642
Re: Snead?

Originally Posted by Beastmode View Post
He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.
I think Steve Largent is a better example for you. HoF receiver without too much speed.
SaintGnome is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/84024-snead.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 08-27-2017 12:19 PM 16
Snead? This thread Refback 08-27-2017 11:10 AM 3


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts