New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Snead? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/84024-snead.html)

Beastmode 08-27-2017 11:07 AM

Snead?
 
What is going on with his situation? Thought he was a lock WR2. Ginn looked good but that one deep drop. Going to hurt us now and then no way around it.

MatthewT 08-27-2017 12:17 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Like in past years, will have 3 starting WRs.

Beastmode 08-27-2017 12:33 PM

Re: Snead?
 
MT is going to get the bulk of it, not by much but Snead, not sure how he is going to get more targets since he lacks the speed of Ginn. Ginn's speed creates a lot more opportunities even with the drops. End around, dumps off the line....Snead, not really his game.

The Dude 08-27-2017 12:34 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Ginn is going to be frustrating to watch. He's going to drop a lot of critical passes but he will also change a game or two on return or in a clutch pass situation. I think we will see more good than bad.
Snead will be fine. He's playing for a contract. We will see what he's really all about this year.

AsylumGuido 08-27-2017 01:10 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Snead should still be a #2 lock. I can't wait until the offense reaches the regular season and truly opens the playbook.

jnormand 08-27-2017 01:13 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Well I really wonder if Snead isn't a little pissed off right now. He's played well the last two years and they didn't really reward him much by having him sign that tender. Oh well.

Seer1 08-27-2017 01:19 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jnormand (Post 761159)
Well I really wonder if Snead isn't a little pissed off right now. He's played well the last two years and they didn't really reward him much by having him sign that tender. Oh well.

I hope he plays a little pissed off this year and looks to a BIG reward next season.

K Major 08-27-2017 01:34 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 761135)
What is going on with his situation? Thought he was a lock WR2. Ginn looked good but that one deep drop. Going to hurt us now and then no way around it.

I thought Ginn looked pretty good as well. He's truly a field stretcher. You can see how the Texans D react when he's out there (see the long run on the reverse). Snead will always be a possession guy. Coach Payton will create mismatches ... press coverage, look for Ginn Jr on the 9 route. If it's zone expect a pass thrown to Snead down the seam (he's money here).

Endless possibilities.

dam1953 08-27-2017 01:34 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 761150)
MT is going to get the bulk of it, not by much but Snead, not sure how he is going to get more targets since he lacks the speed of Ginn. Ginn's speed creates a lot more opportunities even with the drops. End around, dumps off the line....Snead, not really his game.

Sneed also lacked Cooks' speed but still got open. It was the same with Lance Moore. Ginn's speed will be used to spread the secondary, opening things up for Thomas, Sneed, Coleman, Kamara and friends.

Beastmode 08-27-2017 02:21 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Snead, Coleman, Ginn, Fuller, Lampman all contract year. No wonder why they are all trying to play lights out. Granted, Ginn is a 1 year deal but still, he is playing for another one of those. I think Snead will emerge as the #2 once things get going. Too much chemistry with Brees.

WillSaints81 08-27-2017 07:35 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Snead was never a lock to be a WR 2. His role is in the slot and Thomas is the redzone's number one target; Ginn is the deep threat. Both have the best chance to get TDs. Snead has less unless he gets faster. He's just not looked at in the redzone unless Thomas is accounted for by defenses(Denver game last year).

Beastmode 08-27-2017 07:49 PM

Re: Snead?
 
He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.

Utah_Saint 08-28-2017 02:44 AM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 (Post 761202)
Snead was never a lock to be a WR 2. His role is in the slot and Thomas is the redzone's number one target; Ginn is the deep threat. Both have the best chance to get TDs. Snead has less unless he gets faster. He's just not looked at in the redzone unless Thomas is accounted for by defenses(Denver game last year).

Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.

Rugby Saint II 08-28-2017 01:27 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 761229)
Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.

Snead is a possession receiver like Lance Moore. He has a role and almost had 1000 yards last year. I like him a lot!:p

44Champs 08-28-2017 01:37 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Regarding 's Ginn dropped passes, remember that Devery Henderson had the same reputation for dropping passes until Curtis Johnson came along. I believe Johnson is going to do the same for Ginn this year.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

billyt81 08-30-2017 02:26 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 761204)
He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.

This is just not true. Maybe not the quickest guy, but certainly Rice had solid top end speed. In his prime he was the NFLs premier deep threat and I never remember him getting caught from behind.

WillMacKenzie 08-30-2017 02:28 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 44Champs (Post 761278)
Regarding 's Ginn dropped passes, remember that Devery Henderson had the same reputation for dropping passes until Curtis Johnson came along. I believe Johnson is going to do the same for Ginn this year.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

Ginn will break Curtis Johnson, lol joking of course...maybe

K Major 08-30-2017 02:44 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by billyt81 (Post 761645)
This is just not true. Maybe not the quickest guy, but certainly Rice had solid top end speed. In his prime he was the NFLs premier deep threat and I never remember him getting caught from behind.

Precisely.

I remember reading a book by Bill Walsh (Building a Champion). He spoke of how in his scouting (MS Valley State) of Jerry, what separated him from most was his stride and second gear. He had never seen that type of gear in all of his days of scouting receivers . In the open field his long stride gave him functional speed to distant himself from defenders. At the same exact starting point, you never saw Rice get caught from behind. Not once.

He was far from slow.

WHODATINCA 08-30-2017 03:31 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Snead is a producer. Slot receivers take in the head. Literally. It's shi11y what they are doing to him. Bad for morale, too. I bet the locker room loves Willy.

saintfan 08-30-2017 04:32 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 44Champs (Post 761278)
Regarding 's Ginn dropped passes, remember that Devery Henderson had the same reputation for dropping passes until Curtis Johnson came along. I believe Johnson is going to do the same for Ginn this year.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

I was ready to send Henderson packing - Curtis Johnson must be all he is said to be. Somebody sure did fix Devery.

44Champs 08-30-2017 04:56 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillMacKenzie (Post 761646)
Ginn will break Curtis Johnson, lol joking of course...maybe

[emoji3] [emoji3]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

SaintGnome 08-30-2017 06:27 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 761204)
He has more on the line than anyone else so I could see him throwing caution to the wind to make insane grabs. This is his shot to get a deal all or nothing. Jerry Rice was slow as dirt. It can be done.

I think Steve Largent is a better example for you. HoF receiver without too much speed.

QBREES9 09-01-2017 09:13 AM

Re: Snead?
 
I don't know how i feel about Ginn. I guess it wait and see. I know i think Willie Snead is GREAT!!

WillSaints81 09-01-2017 12:25 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 761229)
Depends on how you define your #2. Snead's not a redzone target like Thomas or a threat to score from anywhere on the field like Cooks was but he's a great possession receiver. He's the go to guy when you need a first down. Think of a Julian Edleman type role.

He had a 69% catch percentage, which is outstanding.

Cooks got a first down 38% of the times he was targeted. By comparison Snead got a first down 49% of the times he was targeted.

Cooks got targeted 13 more times than Snead but Snead made 6 more first downs.

If you look at all Snead's stats for last season, he had great numbers for a #2 and he was the third option. Most teams would've loved to get those numbers from their #2 receiver.

Touchdowns get all the glory but you also gotta have someone you can count on to move the chains.

Comparing Cooks incompletions to Snead's is comparing apples to oranges.

Utah_Saint 09-01-2017 01:28 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 (Post 762015)
Comparing Cooks incompletions to Snead's is comparing apples to oranges.

I didn't compare incompletions. I compared 1st down %. I was showing that Snead has been an outstanding possession receiver when it comes to getting first downs and extending drives. My point being, Snead is an excellent #2 receiver. His stats as the third option were better that most team's second option.

Both receivers have good completion percentages. Cooks 66.6%, Snead 69.4% last season.

I'm curious though, why would you say it's comparing apples to oranges?

WillSaints81 09-04-2017 10:18 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 762027)
I didn't compare incompletions. I compared 1st down %. I was showing that Snead has been an outstanding possession receiver when it comes to getting first downs and extending drives. My point being, Snead is an excellent #2 receiver. His stats as the third option were better that most team's second option.

Both receivers have good completion percentages. Cooks 66.6%, Snead 69.4% last season.

I'm curious though, why would you say it's comparing apples to oranges?

Because Cooks was not a possession receiver and many of us thought he would be good in the slot over Colston in 2015. The saints just would not use him in that manner. I'm not sure, was Snead on the field with Colston in 2015 in plays or did they rotate?

jeanpierre 09-04-2017 10:28 PM

Re: Snead?
 
I'd consider Snead better than Ginn, as Snead can, you know, actually receive the pass...

Ginn reminds of Featherstone, Texas State...



Beastmode 09-04-2017 10:44 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Cooks was not good for much. Really could not use him for anything else but stretching the field for some reason. I bet he doesn't even sniff 1K yards this year.

jeanpierre 09-04-2017 10:46 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 762574)
Cooks was not good for much. Really could not use him for anything else but stretching the field for some reason. I bet he doesn't even sniff 1K yards this year.

I'd consider taking that bet and here's why, Tom Brady, Rob Gronkowski and no Julian Edelman (IR) in the NFC East...

Beastmode 09-04-2017 10:51 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 762575)
I'd consider taking that bet and here's why, Tom Brady, Rob Gronkowski and no Julian Edelman (IR) in the NFC East...

They got several other WR's. Edelman hardly ever scored. Cooks is tapped for about 700 yards and almost no TDs with Gronk.

jeanpierre 09-04-2017 11:28 PM

Re: Snead?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 762577)
They got several other WR's. Edelman hardly ever scored. Cooks is tapped for about 700 yards and almost no TDs with Gronk.

Assuming Gronk plays 16 games; remember the Pats haven't had a vertical threat since Randy Moss, and that worked out pretty good statistically...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com