|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; We selected Alfred Fincher over Darryl Blackstock?????? We have got to be retarded....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-23-2005, 09:04 PM | #1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Alfred?!?!?
We selected Alfred Fincher over Darryl Blackstock??????
We have got to be retarded. |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-23-2005, 09:16 PM | #2 |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 65
|
Alfred?!?!?
A least its an LB. When we are at 8-8 next year or worse, at least we won\'t be able to say \"and the Saints didn\'t even bother to get an LB.\" Even if he has projected to be a fifth round LB.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/foo...ers/57597.html |
04-23-2005, 09:21 PM | #3 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,773
|
Alfred?!?!?
From football.com:
|
04-23-2005, 09:23 PM | #4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Alfred?!?!?
Well hey, Mel Kiper likes the pick. I think we could have salvaged this if we had taken Blackstock who was supposed to have been considered for us at the #40 pick. Not to mention he\'s still considered Mel\'s BPA. Unbelievable. We took Alfred Fincher. We passed on Blackstock. Unbelievable.
[Edited on 24/4/2005 by TheDeuce] |
04-23-2005, 09:24 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Monroe, La
Posts: 2,627
|
Alfred?!?!?
http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2005/fincher_alfred
AGILITY 4.76 in the 40-yard dash … 400-pound bench press … 545-pound squat … 329-pound power clean … 32-inch vertical jump … 9-foot-11 broad jump … 32 3/8-inch arm length … 9¾-inch hands. [Edited on 24/4/2005 by nola_swammi] |
04-23-2005, 09:26 PM | #6 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 219
|
Alfred?!?!?
This is obviously a player that the Saints believe will be a run stopping linebacker who will get subbed in with Courtney Watson on running downs. According to the reports I\'ve seen, he probably won\'t be starting material for his entire NFL career. Only marginal upside and limited athletic skills.
Overall, he\'s not a god-awful pick like Bullocks, but he\'s not a good pick for our desperate LB corps. I\'m still VERY disappointed in this year\'s draft. |
04-23-2005, 09:28 PM | #7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Alfred?!?!?
Nola, good edit
[Edited on 24/4/2005 by TheDeuce] |
04-23-2005, 10:16 PM | #8 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 182
|
Alfred?!?!?
Blackstock is a 3-4 LB. The Saints use a 4-3. Do the math. Blackstock is a one-dimensional pass rusher. Our defense can\'t stop the run. Now we can. Do some homework before you go ape-****, OK?! |
04-23-2005, 10:23 PM | #9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Alfred?!?!?
Really? Blackstock is a 3-4 linebacker? No way. I\'ve seen the guy play before. But just because he played in a different scheme in college doesn\'t mean that he can\'t play a 4-3 in the pros. That reasoning makes no sense. He still could have been a talented addition to our unathletic linebacking corps. Besides, what\'s wrong with a little bit of pass rushing? You think just because he rushed the quarterback most of the time in college, that he can\'t do anything else? He can\'t improve? Can\'t adapt? This guy\'s too athletic not too.
[Edited on 24/4/2005 by TheDeuce] |
04-23-2005, 10:25 PM | #10 |
Chuck Liddells Right Hand
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Prairieville, Louisiana
Posts: 1,227
|
Alfred?!?!?
Although we\'re upset with some of the draft picks, I\'m still guessing the FO/scouts know more about these players than anyone on this board. Seriously, we are fans and watch weekly, but I\'m sure there\'s more of a science to it than that.
|