Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham

saintfan · 03-06-2018, 06:30 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Yes, Graham had a choice but he made the choice...

Yes, he knew what he was doing...

.

Rather than acknowledge the rest of that...tripe...let's just stick to the part where you prove my point. Again.

My position is that Jimmy knew what he was doing and could have stopped it had he wanted to. Twice in your last two posts you agree. So what on earth are you still arguing for? Your position is that he was used as an unwitting pawn by the NFLPA. Your position is wrong. Jimmy controls Jimmy. Nobody else.

You keep proving me right. It's time to agree to disagree dude. The quickest way out of a hole is to stop digging bro.

AsylumGuido · 03-06-2018, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

Rather than acknowledge the rest of that...tripe...let's just stick to the part where you prove my point. Again.

My position is that Jimmy knew what he was doing and could have stopped it had he wanted to. Twice in your last two posts you agree. So what on earth are you still arguing for? Your position is that he was used as an unwitting pawn by the NFLPA. Your position is wrong. Jimmy controls Jimmy. Nobody else.

You keep proving me right. It's time to agree to disagree dude. The quickest way out of a hole is to stop digging bro.

The point is WHY should he have stopped it? What damage did it do? He got the exact same contract he would have received regardless.

What was there to stop? What was so terrible about a lawsuit to solve a legal loophole?

Why does it rile you so much. To be honest I enjoyed the legal play since I knew it meant nothing to me personally.

What is your issue?

saintfan · 03-06-2018, 07:07 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

The point is WHY should he have stopped it? What damage did it do? He got the exact same contract he would have received regardless.

What was there to stop? What was so terrible about a lawsuit to solve a legal loophole?

Why does it rile you so much. To be honest I enjoyed the legal play since I knew it meant nothing to me personally.

What is your issue?

No, none of that was the point. The point was I said he knew exactly what he was doing. You said he was just a pawn of the NFLPE and he had no choice. You keep moving the sticks to adjust to your position. Debates do not work that way Sir.

Right now? My "issue"? Well, the fact that you won't just let it go and agree to disagree, which I've been trying to do for a while now.

My point is that Jimmy knew what he was doing. You initially argued that he was merely a pawn. I have shown your take to be bogus, so much so that you have agreed with me in multiple posts.

You lost. Move on. It's ok. It's just a football forum.

AsylumGuido · 03-06-2018, 07:18 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

No, none of that was the point. The point was I said he knew exactly what he was doing. You said he was just a pawn of the NFLPE and he had no choice. You keep moving the sticks to adjust to your position. Debates do not work that way Sir.

Right now? My "issue"? Well, the fact that you won't just let it go and agree to disagree, which I've been trying to do for a while now.

My point is that Jimmy knew what he was doing. You initially argued that he was merely a pawn. I have shown your take to be bogus, so much so that you have agreed with me in multiple posts.

You lost. Move on. It's ok. It's just a football forum.

No. You don't get it. Your point is that he knew what he was doing so he was at fault for doing it. My point is that he knew what he was doing and was convinced by the NFLPA that is was for the best of the union to pursue the issue. He really had no choice balancing getting his contract done early against the good of the whole union membership. In that case he was a pawn. He had no choice but to say yes without letting down the whole NFLPA membership.

I haven't moved my sticks an inch. And my take is anything but bogus. It is based far more in fact than anything you have attempted to present.

Yes, it is just a football forum, but when you choose to present faulty arguments demeaning persons who are not at fault I will come to their defense with a passion.

You, Sir, are wrong. Sorry.

03-06-2018, 06:30 PM	#1
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Yes, Graham had a choice but he made the choice... Yes, he knew what he was doing... . Rather than acknowledge the rest of that...tripe...let's just stick to the part where you prove my point. Again. My position is that Jimmy knew what he was doing and could have stopped it had he wanted to. Twice in your last two posts you agree. So what on earth are you still arguing for? Your position is that he was used as an unwitting pawn by the NFLPA. Your position is wrong. Jimmy controls Jimmy. Nobody else. You keep proving me right. It's time to agree to disagree dude. The quickest way out of a hole is to stop digging bro.
	C'mon Man...

03-06-2018, 07:00 PM	#2
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,855	Re: Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham Originally Posted by saintfan Rather than acknowledge the rest of that...tripe...let's just stick to the part where you prove my point. Again. My position is that Jimmy knew what he was doing and could have stopped it had he wanted to. Twice in your last two posts you agree. So what on earth are you still arguing for? Your position is that he was used as an unwitting pawn by the NFLPA. Your position is wrong. Jimmy controls Jimmy. Nobody else. You keep proving me right. It's time to agree to disagree dude. The quickest way out of a hole is to stop digging bro. The point is WHY should he have stopped it? What damage did it do? He got the exact same contract he would have received regardless. What was there to stop? What was so terrible about a lawsuit to solve a legal loophole? Why does it rile you so much. To be honest I enjoyed the legal play since I knew it meant nothing to me personally. What is your issue?

03-06-2018, 07:07 PM	#3
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham Originally Posted by AsylumGuido The point is WHY should he have stopped it? What damage did it do? He got the exact same contract he would have received regardless. What was there to stop? What was so terrible about a lawsuit to solve a legal loophole? Why does it rile you so much. To be honest I enjoyed the legal play since I knew it meant nothing to me personally. What is your issue? No, none of that was the point. The point was I said he knew exactly what he was doing. You said he was just a pawn of the NFLPE and he had no choice. You keep moving the sticks to adjust to your position. Debates do not work that way Sir. Right now? My "issue"? Well, the fact that you won't just let it go and agree to disagree, which I've been trying to do for a while now. My point is that Jimmy knew what he was doing. You initially argued that he was merely a pawn. I have shown your take to be bogus, so much so that you have agreed with me in multiple posts. You lost. Move on. It's ok. It's just a football forum.
	C'mon Man...

03-06-2018, 07:18 PM	#4
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,855	Re: Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham Originally Posted by saintfan No, none of that was the point. The point was I said he knew exactly what he was doing. You said he was just a pawn of the NFLPE and he had no choice. You keep moving the sticks to adjust to your position. Debates do not work that way Sir. Right now? My "issue"? Well, the fact that you won't just let it go and agree to disagree, which I've been trying to do for a while now. My point is that Jimmy knew what he was doing. You initially argued that he was merely a pawn. I have shown your take to be bogus, so much so that you have agreed with me in multiple posts. You lost. Move on. It's ok. It's just a football forum. No. You don't get it. Your point is that he knew what he was doing so he was at fault for doing it. My point is that he knew what he was doing and was convinced by the NFLPA that is was for the best of the union to pursue the issue. He really had no choice balancing getting his contract done early against the good of the whole union membership. In that case he was a pawn. He had no choice but to say yes without letting down the whole NFLPA membership. I haven't moved my sticks an inch. And my take is anything but bogus. It is based far more in fact than anything you have attempted to present. Yes, it is just a football forum, but when you choose to present faulty arguments demeaning persons who are not at fault I will come to their defense with a passion. You, Sir, are wrong. Sorry.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/87622-saints-interested-reunion-jimmy-graham.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Saints interested in reunion with Jimmy Graham	This thread	Refback	03-05-2018 03:43 PM	2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	03-05-2018 03:37 PM	7