Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games(Update: Appeal denied)

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by CheramieIII They may just alternate Edmunds and Scott? Ingram is a dumbarse for doing it. It's not like he didn't know he would get caught. It doesn't appear to be anything nefarious. It was something that falls ...

Like Tree103Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2018, 09:40 AM   #1
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Originally Posted by CheramieIII View Post
They may just alternate Edmunds and Scott? Ingram is a dumbarse for doing it. It's not like he didn't know he would get caught.
It doesn't appear to be anything nefarious. It was something that falls under Therapeutic Use Exemptions. That could be something like Rogaine for male pattern baldness.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 09:41 AM   #2
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 38,794
Blog Entries: 29
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Rugby Saint II likes this.
SmashMouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 09:58 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 38,794
Blog Entries: 29
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

The first part of the defense, that the substance is “permissible with the proper use exemption,” doesn’t mean much. If Ingram had the proper use exemption, the NFL wouldn’t have moved to suspend him in the first place. All sorts of banned performance-enhancing substances, from Adderall to testosterone to human growth hormone, can be prescribed by doctors and used legally. But that doesn’t mean that a player who tests positive for them without having first obtained a therapeutic use exemption is going to get anywhere by noting after the fact that he theoretically could have used the substance legally.

The second part of the defense, that Ingram “has vigorously challenged the test results,” would seem contradictory with the first defense. If Ingram is going to claim he was using the banned substance for a therapeutic reason, then there would be no need to challenge the test results because he would readily admit that the substance was in his body. If Ingram is claiming that the test was invalid and he didn’t use the substance, then what difference does it make if he could have used it with a proper use exemption?

An arbitrator’s ruling is expected within a week. Unless there’s more to Ingram’s appeal than his agents’ statement suggests, it’s hard to see him avoiding the suspension. Ingram was the leading rusher for the Saints last season but is reportedly unhappy with his contract and not planning to participate in voluntary offseason work.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ned-substance/
jeanpierre likes this.
SmashMouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 10:09 AM   #4
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
The first part of the defense, that the substance is “permissible with the proper use exemption,” doesn’t mean much. If Ingram had the proper use exemption, the NFL wouldn’t have moved to suspend him in the first place. All sorts of banned performance-enhancing substances, from Adderall to testosterone to human growth hormone, can be prescribed by doctors and used legally. But that doesn’t mean that a player who tests positive for them without having first obtained a therapeutic use exemption is going to get anywhere by noting after the fact that he theoretically could have used the substance legally.

The second part of the defense, that Ingram “has vigorously challenged the test results,” would seem contradictory with the first defense. If Ingram is going to claim he was using the banned substance for a therapeutic reason, then there would be no need to challenge the test results because he would readily admit that the substance was in his body. If Ingram is claiming that the test was invalid and he didn’t use the substance, then what difference does it make if he could have used it with a proper use exemption?

An arbitrator’s ruling is expected within a week. Unless there’s more to Ingram’s appeal than his agents’ statement suggests, it’s hard to see him avoiding the suspension. Ingram was the leading rusher for the Saints last season but is reportedly unhappy with his contract and not planning to participate in voluntary offseason work.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ned-substance/
Consider the source on that one, Michael David Smith. A Chicago based blogger with no legal expertise. Once again, let's wait and see. If a suspension does come down it doesn't mean it was anything of an egregious nature.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 10:05 AM   #5
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Here's Ingram's camp's first public response...



Update: Apologies Chris, saw you posted this - guess this thread is really hot this a.m. - life moving fast in the B&G...
jeanpierre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 10:10 AM   #6
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,793
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

In a statement, Ingram's agent said his client had a "proper use exemption" for the substance which Ingram tested positive. "At the end of the 2017 season, as a result of a NFL mandated random drug test, Mark tested positive for a substance that was not a performance enhancing substance, nor an illegal substance, but a substance in fact permissible with the proper use exemption with the NFL," Ingram's agent said. A decision from an arbitrator is due by May 16.

Source: New Orleans Times-Picayune
jeanpierre and darksoul35 like this.
papz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 10:41 AM   #7
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 785
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Hope this all works out for Ingram.....we need him the first 4 games. If his Agent's statement is correct, it seems very unusual it would have gotten to the point of handing down a suspension. Something tells me that the truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle. Guess we wait to hear from the arbitrator.....
Garry42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 10:49 AM   #8
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Its disappointing that so many people assumed Mark was snortin coke, smokin crack, and shootin roids all at the same time.
darksoul35 and K Major like this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 11:00 AM   #9
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Its disappointing that so many people assumed Mark was snortin coke, smokin crack, and shootin roids all at the same time.
Yes it is. Not surprising, but very disappointing.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 11:17 AM   #10
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,830
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Its disappointing that so many people assumed Mark was snortin coke, smokin crack, and shootin roids all at the same time.
Character assassination...

Tough crowd .
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/88711-mark-ingram-suspended-four-games-update-appeal-denied.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games(Update: Appeal denied) This thread Refback 05-09-2018 12:53 PM 1
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 05-09-2018 12:35 PM 3
Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games This thread Refback 05-08-2018 05:31 PM 3
Mark Ingram Suspended Four Games This thread Refback 05-08-2018 03:30 PM 6


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts