|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by The Dude Highlight it for whose benefit? The coaches and other offensive players already know he’s out of position as soon as the ball is snapped. They don’t need to have it “pointed out”. There is no ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Nick Underhill: Marcus Davenport holds his own in his Saints preseason debut; plus other observations
Originally Posted by The Dude
![]()
Nola.com: 'Average at best.' Sean Payton not pleased with wide receiver play ..."In general, watching it for two weeks now, it hasn't been good," Payton said. "I think the receiver play has been average at best"... ...Payton said veteran receiver Ted Ginn twice either ran the wrong route or was not aligned properly. "It's in the details," Payton said. "And listen, we've got to ask are we asking the right guys to do it? And are we asking them to do too much? But I think it's been sloppy, honestly"... Quarterbacks, trusted by their coaches, who know their jobs, do actually make statement plays to get their teammates attention... And it's not unheard of - even the Dolphins Tanneyhill just through a rookie out of a huddle for not knowing blocking assignments... So to ponder that Brees threw the ball where it was "planned to be" to show that Ginn was again out of position, is not the stretch you seem to think it is... Knowing how much preparation Brees puts, don't you think he'd demand the same from teammates? especially, as you aptly posted how... |
It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,060
|
Re: Nick Underhill: Marcus Davenport holds his own in his Saints preseason debut; plus other observations
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Tannahil throwing a receiver out of a huddle is one thing, I even said Brees probably confronted him after the play but saying he threw an interception on purpose is different. There are better ways to get your point across.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |