USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson

The Dude · 10-16-2018, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

https://twitter.com/WWLAMFM/status/1052383612203618304

Seriously? WWL? What do we have to trade? Ingram? I wouldn’t do it. Peat? Jordon? We have no draft picks worth a damn so it would have to be an impact player on our roster plus.
No way this happens.

jeanpierre · 10-17-2018, 06:58 AM

Originally Posted by The Dude

Seriously? WWL? What do we have to trade? Ingram? I wouldn’t do it. Peat? Jordon? We have no draft picks worth a damn so it would have to be an impact player on our roster plus.
No way this happens.

Can't ignore we have a serious liability opposite Lattimore, so discussion about trading for a CB at this point is the only serious option on the table...

But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option...

AsylumGuido · 10-17-2018, 07:22 AM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Can't ignore we have a serious liability opposite Lattimore, so discussion about trading for a CB at this point is the only serious option on the table...

But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option...

There are plenty of other in-season options. The move to pick up what may very well end up being a generational edge rusher won't stand in the way of a deal if they truly want to execute one. And who knows, without Davenport being in there the remainder of the season all hopes of winning it all may not even be in play, thus making talk of adding an additional key piece to the puzzle moot.

K Major · 10-17-2018, 07:32 AM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option...

JP -

The Saints have a really good team lined up for 2018 & beyond. This is unnecessary stressing over what the Saints front office did with draft picks last off season.

You've got all of 2020 to complain if Davenport (he's already a monster after 4 games) doesn't end up developing.

Let's go get it !

10-16-2018, 10:26 PM	#1
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060	Re: USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson Originally Posted by jeanpierre https://twitter.com/WWLAMFM/status/1052383612203618304 Seriously? WWL? What do we have to trade? Ingram? I wouldn’t do it. Peat? Jordon? We have no draft picks worth a damn so it would have to be an impact player on our roster plus. No way this happens.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060

10-17-2018, 06:58 AM	#2
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson Originally Posted by The Dude Seriously? WWL? What do we have to trade? Ingram? I wouldn’t do it. Peat? Jordon? We have no draft picks worth a damn so it would have to be an impact player on our roster plus. No way this happens. Can't ignore we have a serious liability opposite Lattimore, so discussion about trading for a CB at this point is the only serious option on the table... But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option...

10-17-2018, 07:22 AM	#3
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson Originally Posted by jeanpierre Can't ignore we have a serious liability opposite Lattimore, so discussion about trading for a CB at this point is the only serious option on the table... But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option... There are plenty of other in-season options. The move to pick up what may very well end up being a generational edge rusher won't stand in the way of a deal if they truly want to execute one. And who knows, without Davenport being in there the remainder of the season all hopes of winning it all may not even be in play, thus making talk of adding an additional key piece to the puzzle moot.

10-17-2018, 07:32 AM	#4
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,831 Blog Entries: 3	Re: USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson Originally Posted by jeanpierre But you're right, trading two draft picks for Davenport, no matter how well he's coming on was stupid, foolish and costly; it left us without an in-season option... JP - The Saints have a really good team lined up for 2018 & beyond. This is unnecessary stressing over what the Saints front office did with draft picks last off season. You've got all of 2020 to complain if Davenport (he's already a monster after 4 games) doesn't end up developing. Let's go get it ! AsylumGuido, WW_Who_Dat, cmike and 1 others like this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/90515-usa-today-saints-wire-deion-sanders-saints-should-trade-patrick-peterson.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-10-2018 05:25 PM	10
USA Today/Saints Wire: Deion Sanders: Saints should trade for Patrick Peterson	This thread	Refback	10-10-2018 05:20 PM	9