![]() |
Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Against teams with a record of 4-6 or better (8 games), they've given up 32.4 (!!) points per game, including 45 to the Saints and 51 (!!) at HOME against the Chiefs. They had a grand total of 0 (!!) sacks against the Saints, yet every single media member outside of NOLA beat writers still drools over Aaron Donald and Marcus Peters.
Saints defense by comparison has given up 19.6 PPG against teams 4-6 or better in 6 games. |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
They aren’t. I don’t think many are saying they are any good. They got some TOs against KC but I think that was more about Mahommes inexperience an inability to hold onto the ball when pressured. The Rams produced 3 turnovers and still almost lost.
Their home field advantage sucks too. I think there is something off in the structure of the standings when we both have one loss, theirs to us, yet they are ahead of us. Goes to show you how much a division loss hurts. |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
They rightly drool over Donald he's a damn beast. The issue from what I've seen is the rest of the line wants sacks. Especially Suh, can't have both DT trying to sack and not playing the run. And like the Falcons they are small at linebacker. All well and good when playing the pass but a 225lb ILB not going to hold the middle when the two DT have left space for the runner to build up a head of steam.
I like Peters but he has sucked since the trade |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
Conference tie breakers Head-to-head, if applicable. (For ties among three or more teams, this step is only applied if there is a head-to-head sweep; i.e., if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.) Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four. Strength of victory (record of all the teams they defeated that season). Strength of schedule (record of all the teams they played that season). Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed. Best net points in conference games. Best net points in all games. Best net touchdowns in all games |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
Ties are the same BTW. Worth a 1/2 win. That's why Minnesota at 5-4-1 are ahead of the teams that are 5-5. SFIAH |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
It's not! When you let a team hang 51 on you or even 35 your D ain't s**t!
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
NFL.com's playoff picture has us at #1 seed... The Rams are not ranked above us.
NFL Playoff Picture - NFL.com In conference rankings we are above the Rams. https://www.nfl.com/standings/conference/2018/REG No other lists matter. |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
SFIAH |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Loomis dodged a bullet not signing Suh.
The Rams can't stop the run, but the Saints can and DO. It's not only the defensive line of the Rams not staying home because they want to rush the passer all the time... but their LBs are not as good as the Saints' LBs. Did I really just type that? YES BECAUSE IT'S TRUE! |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
All-Paper 2018.
Because. |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Son Of Bum..
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
I'm pretty confident that the Bears are going to beat the Rams. If the Rams get stuck in snow, they are screwed.
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...reuben-foster/ |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
I think they rely on scoring 40 points and hope Darnold can make one big play to hold the other team to 39
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
1. They’re weak at linebacker.
2. Marcus Peters is playing through and injury and in a system that doesn’t fit him. 3. Aqib Talib bring out definitely hurts. They have REALLY good players on that defense. It just hasn’t jelled. Peters, Talib, and Robey-Coleman is a really good trio. I need to see what they look like when Talib comes back. |
Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
With chase Daniels? Maybe but not likely they need trebisksy |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
Watch the Lambs fold up like cheap lawn chairs at Solider field. Weather will be 32 degrees or under. |
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Timing means a lot! We need to win every time.
|
Re: Can you explain to me how the Rams D is "good"?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com