Hakim visits; Ruff to be cut, finally

WhoDat · 06-01-2005, 09:35 PM

Originally Posted by natedogg02

At least he could stop a run from time to time, unlike Rodgers, who has stunk it up since he's been here. (Rodgers should've went first.) (I liked ruff, but its time to part)

Uuhh... I'd argue that Rodgers was the best LB on the team in his first year with the Saints (2 years ago?). We knew when we signed him that he was old and only had a few good years left. He gave us one to one and a half. Ruff never gave us much of anything. But you're right, both can be let go and this team wouldn't lose a thing.

06-01-2005, 09:35 PM	#1
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Originally Posted by natedogg02 At least he could stop a run from time to time, unlike Rodgers, who has stunk it up since he's been here. (Rodgers should've went first.) (I liked ruff, but its time to part) Uuhh... I'd argue that Rodgers was the best LB on the team in his first year with the Saints (2 years ago?). We knew when we signed him that he was old and only had a few good years left. He gave us one to one and a half. Ruff never gave us much of anything. But you're right, both can be let go and this team wouldn't lose a thing.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631