QB Controversy

Halo · 12-30-2018, 03:56 PM

The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.

jnormand · 12-30-2018, 03:57 PM

Lmao!!! You guys are clowns.

blackangold · 12-30-2018, 04:12 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

yet he scored more points and threw more td's than drew could against this same team. And he had less people at his disposal.

???

Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).

spkb25 · 12-30-2018, 04:14 PM

Originally Posted by blackangold

Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement.

Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).

dude come on...

I actually got the idea because someone on this board literally told me that chase had better numbers than drew as an insinuation it meant he was better than drew.(for that week) So I just wanted to post something absurd and see how many peeps would comment

Plus it is going to be boring until the divisional round so figured I'd have a little fun

RailBoss · 12-30-2018, 05:14 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

Kyle Allen 16-27 228 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs, 33 points

Cam Newton 16-29 131 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 9 points

Supports our Saints history of making all stars out of first time QB starters

Not to mention Journeyman QB's like Ryan Fitzpatrick & Sam Bradford as well.
Even Roman Gabriel gave thought about coming out of retirement against the saints.

st thomas · 12-30-2018, 10:40 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

To be fair I don't think SP played this game to win

Didn’t give a second look at playing to win just like 2009 oh ya we won it all that year . Meaningless flop guys let’s move on

st thomas · 12-30-2018, 10:41 PM

Originally Posted by Halo

The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm.

Lmfao I love it

TheKillerBs · 12-31-2018, 08:39 AM

This is an amusing thread, but I would like to address all the haters that I've been seeing (Not here, mind you. Mostly on Facebook.) who are all like "We're in deep trouble if this guy takes over after Drew leaves."

Guys, he was making his first start in three years, behind a patchwork O-line, mostly handing off to a 3rd string RB, with the most vanilla of vanilla play calling. Give the guy a break!

burningmetal · 12-31-2018, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

Offense had to get the lead for the defense to protect.

I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.

WhoDat!656 · 12-31-2018, 09:52 AM

Originally Posted by burningmetal

I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply.

Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite.

The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.

How soon we forget the years when the offense had to score like a pinball machine because the defense couldn't protect a lead.

12-30-2018, 03:56 PM	#21
Halo Site Donor MONTHLY Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 20,924 Blog Entries: 45	Re: QB Controversy The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm. spkb25, foreverfan, saintsfan1976 and 1 others like this.

12-30-2018, 03:57 PM	#22
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,787	Re: QB Controversy Lmao!!! You guys are clowns. spkb25, 73Saint, 44Champs and 1 others like this.

12-30-2018, 04:12 PM	#23
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by spkb25 yet he scored more points and threw more td's than drew could against this same team. And he had less people at his disposal. ??? Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement. Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success).

12-30-2018, 04:14 PM	#24
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,145	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by blackangold Not sure if you are serious here. Are you saying Teddy should be starting over Drew, that would be a foolish statement. Also, to say these were the same teams is erroneous. Carolina had 2nd and 3rd stringers on D for the 4th qtr (when Teddy had some success). dude come on... I actually got the idea because someone on this board literally told me that chase had better numbers than drew as an insinuation it meant he was better than drew.(for that week) So I just wanted to post something absurd and see how many peeps would comment Plus it is going to be boring until the divisional round so figured I'd have a little fun

12-30-2018, 05:14 PM	#25
RailBoss 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line Posts: 7,113	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by SmashMouth Kyle Allen 16-27 228 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs, 33 points Cam Newton 16-29 131 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 9 points Supports our Saints history of making all stars out of first time QB starters Not to mention Journeyman QB's like Ryan Fitzpatrick & Sam Bradford as well. Even Roman Gabriel gave thought about coming out of retirement against the saints.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-30-2018, 10:40 PM	#26
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 To be fair I don't think SP played this game to win Didn’t give a second look at playing to win just like 2009 oh ya we won it all that year . Meaningless flop guys let’s move on

12-30-2018, 10:41 PM	#27
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by Halo The sooner we can dump Brees, the faster we'll be popping wheelies and collecting Superbowl rings with Teddy at the helm. Lmfao I love it jnormand and spkb25 like this.

12-31-2018, 08:39 AM	#28
TheKillerBs Thread Killer Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Hammond, LA Posts: 366	Re: QB Controversy This is an amusing thread, but I would like to address all the haters that I've been seeing (Not here, mind you. Mostly on Facebook.) who are all like "We're in deep trouble if this guy takes over after Drew leaves." Guys, he was making his first start in three years, behind a patchwork O-line, mostly handing off to a 3rd string RB, with the most vanilla of vanilla play calling. Give the guy a break! Halo, st thomas and frydaddy like this.

12-31-2018, 09:20 AM	#29
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 Offense had to get the lead for the defense to protect. I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply. Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite. The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere.
	If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.

12-31-2018, 09:52 AM	#30
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,097	Re: QB Controversy Originally Posted by burningmetal I guess it's stupid for me to post in the Saints forum, since certain people will say "you don't have the right", but, whatever. I just saw this comment and I can't help but reply. Regardless of any controversy or no controversy, it just doesn't make any sense to say that the offense had to give the team a lead to protect. Who protected the lead, if they won a game while scoring 12 points? The offense? Not quite. The extent to which people will go to protect the "sacred" ground Brees walks on has always amazed me. And I'm not doggin' on the guy, either. But there has to be a limit somewhere. How soon we forget the years when the offense had to score like a pinball machine because the defense couldn't protect a lead.