Lindy's Rating The Teams

tiggerpolice · 06-30-2005, 08:49 AM

The following chart is a compilation of the position ratings for each team that were included in the preview stories. Each unit is rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest. Intangibles had a plus or minus of no more than 2. That figure was added or subtracted from the total of all positions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COACH QB RB REC OL DL LB SEC ST INT TOTAL
NFC EAST
Philadelphia 8.5 8.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 +1 69.5
Dallas 9.0 6.5 6.5 8.0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 6.0 E 66.5
Washington 8.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 -1 65.5
N.Y. Giants 7.5 5.0 7.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 +2 61.0
NFC North
Green Bay 8.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 E 66.0
Minnesota 7.5 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 6.0 7.5 6.0 -1 63.5
Detroit 8.0 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 +2 63.0
Chicago 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 -2 59.5
NFC South
Carolina 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 10.0 7.5 6.0 7.5 +2 70.5
Atlanta 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 +1 65.5
Tampa Bay 8.0 7.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 8.5 6.5 -1 65.5
New Orleans 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 -1 63.0
NFC West
St. Louis 7.5 7.5 7.5 9.0 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 +1 68.0
Seattle 8.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.5 7.5 6.5 +2 66.5
Arizona 8.0 6.0 6.5 8.0 7.0 5.5 5.5 6.5 8.0 E 61.0
San Francisco 7.0 5.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 9.0 7.5 6.0 E 61.0
AFC East
New England 10.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 7.0 +2 70.0
Miami 6.5 6.0 8.0 7.5 6.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 -1 67.0
Buffalo 6.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 +1 64.5
N.Y. Jets 7.0 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 +2 62.5
AFC North
Baltimore 8.0 5.5 9.0 6.0 8.5 6.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 +1 68.0
Cincinnati 7.5 6.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 +1 65.5
Pittsburgh 8.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 E 63.5
Cleveland 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 +1 63.0
AFC South
Indianapolis 9.0 9.5 8.5 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 -2 69.5
Tennessee 9.0 9.0 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.5 7.0 7.0 -1 68.5
Houston 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 +1 63.0
Jacksonville 6.0 6.0 9.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 -1 60.5
AFC West
Kansas City 9.0 8.0 9.0 6.5 9.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 7.0 -1 67.0
Denver 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 E 65.5
Oakland 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 7.5 6.5 7.0 9.0 +2 65.5
San Diego 7.0 5.5 10.0 5.5 5.5 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 -1 57.5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: QB=Quarterbacks; RB=Running Backs; REC=Wide Receivers/Tight Ends; OL=Offensive Linemen; DL=Defensive Linemen; LB=Linebackers; SEC=Secondary; ST=Special Teams; INT=Intangibles

http://www.lindyssports.com/home/fbpro2.html

Euphoria · 06-30-2005, 11:01 AM

I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.

saintswhodi · 06-30-2005, 11:11 AM

I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.

Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns.

papz · 06-30-2005, 11:45 AM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.

Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns.

Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! "[<insert dancing brocolli here>]"

saintz08 · 06-30-2005, 12:47 PM

Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7?

That QB in Carolina , I think his name is Jake Delhomme , his rating was 7.5 and Brooks is 7.0.

WhoDat must have not seen this yet ......

WhoDat · 06-30-2005, 09:39 PM

Hadn't. Have now. I think that's hilarious.

But I ultimately agree with Whodi. What a freaking sham those ratings are.

Our WRs, which are have been a concern outside of Horn are an 8 but Deuce is a 7. Our D-line ranks as high as our RB??? Get the F out of here.

BlackandBlue · 07-01-2005, 05:59 PM

You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do.

Yeah, ok.

And can someone explain to me the whole, "this team is not as talented as everyone makes them out to be," mentality that I've been reading on these boards the past few days?

LordOfEntropy · 07-02-2005, 10:21 AM

Looks like you killed another thread.

FireVenturi · 07-02-2005, 12:26 PM

omg look at what they have our special teams? and rb? they just lost all credibility!

saintz08 · 07-02-2005, 12:53 PM

You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do.

Yeah, ok.

Sure why not .

Using Saintfan logic .......

All Jake Delhomme does is hand off .......Yet for some reason he throws for more yards then Brooks in the wide open Saint offense .

Now take into consideration , the Saints are 1 high ankle sprain away from no running game . Carolina can pretty much run whom ever and get the yards . Jake has put the ball down the field and had breakout seasons for Smith and Moose and it seems that Carolina has a good receiver waiting to breakout now every year . Saints have Horn and despite his strong year , still underachieved in comparison to Moose . The rest of the Saints receivers are unproven .

06-30-2005, 08:49 AM	#1
tiggerpolice 500th Post Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: new orleans Posts: 584	Lindy's Rating The Teams The following chart is a compilation of the position ratings for each team that were included in the preview stories. Each unit is rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest. Intangibles had a plus or minus of no more than 2. That figure was added or subtracted from the total of all positions. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COACH QB RB REC OL DL LB SEC ST INT TOTAL NFC EAST Philadelphia 8.5 8.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 +1 69.5 Dallas 9.0 6.5 6.5 8.0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 6.0 E 66.5 Washington 8.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 -1 65.5 N.Y. Giants 7.5 5.0 7.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 +2 61.0 NFC North Green Bay 8.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 E 66.0 Minnesota 7.5 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 6.0 7.5 6.0 -1 63.5 Detroit 8.0 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 +2 63.0 Chicago 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 -2 59.5 NFC South Carolina 8.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 6.0 10.0 7.5 6.0 7.5 +2 70.5 Atlanta 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 +1 65.5 Tampa Bay 8.0 7.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 8.5 6.5 -1 65.5 New Orleans 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 -1 63.0 NFC West St. Louis 7.5 7.5 7.5 9.0 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 +1 68.0 Seattle 8.0 8.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.5 7.5 6.5 +2 66.5 Arizona 8.0 6.0 6.5 8.0 7.0 5.5 5.5 6.5 8.0 E 61.0 San Francisco 7.0 5.5 8.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 9.0 7.5 6.0 E 61.0 AFC East New England 10.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 7.0 +2 70.0 Miami 6.5 6.0 8.0 7.5 6.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 -1 67.0 Buffalo 6.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 +1 64.5 N.Y. Jets 7.0 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 +2 62.5 AFC North Baltimore 8.0 5.5 9.0 6.0 8.5 6.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 +1 68.0 Cincinnati 7.5 6.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 +1 65.5 Pittsburgh 8.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 E 63.5 Cleveland 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 +1 63.0 AFC South Indianapolis 9.0 9.5 8.5 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 -2 69.5 Tennessee 9.0 9.0 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.5 7.0 7.0 -1 68.5 Houston 8.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 +1 63.0 Jacksonville 6.0 6.0 9.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 -1 60.5 AFC West Kansas City 9.0 8.0 9.0 6.5 9.0 6.5 7.0 6.0 7.0 -1 67.0 Denver 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 E 65.5 Oakland 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 7.5 6.5 7.0 9.0 +2 65.5 San Diego 7.0 5.5 10.0 5.5 5.5 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 -1 57.5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: QB=Quarterbacks; RB=Running Backs; REC=Wide Receivers/Tight Ends; OL=Offensive Linemen; DL=Defensive Linemen; LB=Linebackers; SEC=Secondary; ST=Special Teams; INT=Intangibles http://www.lindyssports.com/home/fbpro2.html

06-30-2005, 11:01 AM	#2
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	RE: Lindy I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on.

06-30-2005, 11:45 AM	#4
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,744	Originally Posted by saintswhodi I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on. Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! "[<insert dancing brocolli here>]"

06-30-2005, 12:47 PM	#5
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? That QB in Carolina , I think his name is Jake Delhomme , his rating was 7.5 and Brooks is 7.0. WhoDat must have not seen this yet ......
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020

06-30-2005, 09:39 PM	#6
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Hadn't. Have now. I think that's hilarious. But I ultimately agree with Whodi. What a freaking sham those ratings are. Our WRs, which are have been a concern outside of Horn are an 8 but Deuce is a 7. Our D-line ranks as high as our RB??? Get the F out of here.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

06-30-2005, 11:11 AM	#3
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	I am glad someone sees (like me) we have less talent than all the hype that goes on. Um, they have Minnesota ranked about the same as us, when they are clearly better. They gave Tom Brady and 8 at QB, and AB got a 7? If Tom Brady is an 8, AB is a 3, at best. They gave Culpepper the same grade as Brady. They rated McNabb BETTER. Yeah, these guys know what they are talking about. Hell, Trent Green is rated the same as Brady, and Jake Plummer is half a point under. JAKE PLUMMER. Hell, J.P. freaking Losman is only a half point below Brady on this chart, but he is rated better than AB. You may wanna read what's going on more before tossing your hat in with these clowns.

07-01-2005, 05:59 PM	#7
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do. Yeah, ok. And can someone explain to me the whole, "this team is not as talented as everyone makes them out to be," mentality that I've been reading on these boards the past few days?

07-02-2005, 10:21 AM	#8
LordOfEntropy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Cary, NC Posts: 1,838	Looks like you killed another thread.

07-02-2005, 12:26 PM	#9
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	omg look at what they have our special teams? and rb? they just lost all credibility!

07-02-2005, 12:53 PM	#10
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	You missed the fact that the first rating goes to the coach. According to these rankings, Carolina has better running backs and wide receivers than we do. Yeah, ok. Sure why not . Using Saintfan logic ....... All Jake Delhomme does is hand off .......Yet for some reason he throws for more yards then Brooks in the wide open Saint offense . Now take into consideration , the Saints are 1 high ankle sprain away from no running game . Carolina can pretty much run whom ever and get the yards . Jake has put the ball down the field and had breakout seasons for Smith and Moose and it seems that Carolina has a good receiver waiting to breakout now every year . Saints have Horn and despite his strong year , still underachieved in comparison to Moose . The rest of the Saints receivers are unproven .
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020