Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

statistics

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Euphoria I just don't wanna here Brooks getting the blame for everything when its a team game. If you blame Brooks then you damn well better give him the credit when they win. ... nice try, but ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-06-2005, 10:34 AM   #11
Merces Letifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
Re: RE: Re: RE: statistics

Originally Posted by Euphoria
I just don't wanna here Brooks getting the blame for everything when its a team game. If you blame Brooks then you damn well better give him the credit when they win.


... nice try, but the Brooks argument got elevated to what it is today because, after the playoff win, Brooks was given credit for everything good and none of the blame for anything bad. Don't try to spin it the other way.

There are 4 very specific situations that have made this argument what it is today:

1.- Brooks getting #2 before arriving to N.O. Remember QB 2-a and QB 2-b? That started the rumblings...
2.- Neither Blake nor Delhomme getting a real chance to compete for the starting position in 2001. That "competition" was a charade. Very hard to compete for the #1 position when you only practice and play with the 2nd and 3rd teams during preseason.
3.- The viciousness of some fans towards Jake Delhomme because some other fans wanted Jake to get a shot.
4.- The virtual anointment of Brooks: if the Saints won, it was Brooks; if the Saints lost, this player dropped the ball, that one didn't block, it's the defense, it's the waterboy; and of course the "Brooks is better than Archie" spiel...
Tobias-Reiper is offline  
 


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts