Antonio Brown...should we?

ScottF · 09-07-2019, 12:13 PM

Just kidding. Wouldn't even want him for vet minimum

vpheughan · 09-07-2019, 12:25 PM

The Panthers!! Two guys pouting on the bench with towels over their heads!!! Purrrrrrrrrrrrfict!!!

Euphoria · 09-07-2019, 12:26 PM

actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him.

Whats wrong with a one year deal?

Lord_Saint83 · 09-07-2019, 12:29 PM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him.

Whats wrong with a one year deal?

Idk if Belichick would even touch this guy with a ten foot pole.

st thomas · 09-07-2019, 12:34 PM

Let NE have that clown. I believe he wanted out of raiders trash team when he saw what it really looked like. So stomp ur feet and cause crap to get out and he succeeded. He with go to Boston and behave. That is all.

saintfan · 09-07-2019, 12:35 PM

He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that.

It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired.

hitta · 09-07-2019, 12:39 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that.

It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired.

I actually disagree with that. Loomis tries hard to remain neutral and let the locker room dynamics do their own thing. Mayock inserted himself into an issue that seemed like was already solved. Brown was was ready to play with a new helmet. Gruden was fine with him. Mayock is a douchebag. I don't like Brown, but this isn't entirely his fault imo. If the coach wanted the guy gone, then he should be gone. This was more about Mayock wanting to validate his authority or some ****.

st thomas · 09-07-2019, 12:47 PM

Originally Posted by hitta

I actually disagree with that. Loomis tries hard to remain neutral and let the locker room dynamics do their own thing. Mayock inserted himself into an issue that seemed like was already solved. Brown was was ready to play with a new helmet. Gruden was fine with him. Mayock is a douchebag. I don't like Brown, but this isn't entirely his fault imo. If the coach wanted the guy gone, then he should be gone. This was more about Mayock wanting to validate his authority or some ****.

I hear ya but Brown is a pre Madonna -dough bag but is good and he won’t be in my locker room ever ever ever.

K Major · 09-07-2019, 12:51 PM

Man hell naw.

This team has no time to be playing games with a malcontent.

It's too hard trying to win games without distractions as it is.

hitta · 09-07-2019, 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by st thomas

I hear ya but Brown is a pre Madonna -dough bag but is good and he won’t be in my locker room ever ever ever.

Yea, I mean there is no disputing that. My issue is for weeks now, you've had all the coaches and the organizations talk about how much they supported him over the helmet issue. Then suddenly, a week before the season, you fine him to the point where it voids his guaranteed money. It really just feels like Mayock wanted to display his authority. It feels like mixed messages, and Mayock should have let Gruden decide how to handle it. Not have some sort of weird dick measuring contest. Brown was ready to play, chose a new helmet and everything. Something just feels very wrong with how this was handled. You either tell him to get his ass on the field a few weeks back and say that you were upset with how Brown was handling things, or you let it go. The whole thing is a giant bag of mixed signals . This is not how you run a front office. Loomis would never do this kind of ****.

09-07-2019, 12:13 PM	#1
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Antonio Brown...should we? Just kidding. Wouldn't even want him for vet minimum jnormand likes this.

09-07-2019, 12:25 PM	#2
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,520	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? The Panthers!! Two guys pouting on the bench with towels over their heads!!! Purrrrrrrrrrrrfict!!! jnormand, RailBoss, dizzle88 and 1 others like this.
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,520

09-07-2019, 12:26 PM	#3
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him. Whats wrong with a one year deal? subguy, Crusader and rezburna like this.

09-07-2019, 12:29 PM	#4
Lord_Saint83 100% Blunt Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Saint Gabriel, La Posts: 2,754	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Originally Posted by Euphoria actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him. Whats wrong with a one year deal? Idk if Belichick would even touch this guy with a ten foot pole.

09-07-2019, 12:34 PM	#5
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Let NE have that clown. I believe he wanted out of raiders trash team when he saw what it really looked like. So stomp ur feet and cause crap to get out and he succeeded. He with go to Boston and behave. That is all. jnormand likes this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

09-07-2019, 12:35 PM	#6
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that. It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired. jnormand likes this.

09-07-2019, 12:39 PM	#7
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Originally Posted by saintfan He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that. It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired. I actually disagree with that. Loomis tries hard to remain neutral and let the locker room dynamics do their own thing. Mayock inserted himself into an issue that seemed like was already solved. Brown was was ready to play with a new helmet. Gruden was fine with him. Mayock is a douchebag. I don't like Brown, but this isn't entirely his fault imo. If the coach wanted the guy gone, then he should be gone. This was more about Mayock wanting to validate his authority or some ****. rezburna likes this.
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320

09-07-2019, 12:47 PM	#8
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Originally Posted by hitta I actually disagree with that. Loomis tries hard to remain neutral and let the locker room dynamics do their own thing. Mayock inserted himself into an issue that seemed like was already solved. Brown was was ready to play with a new helmet. Gruden was fine with him. Mayock is a douchebag. I don't like Brown, but this isn't entirely his fault imo. If the coach wanted the guy gone, then he should be gone. This was more about Mayock wanting to validate his authority or some ****. I hear ya but Brown is a pre Madonna -dough bag but is good and he won’t be in my locker room ever ever ever. jnormand likes this.

09-07-2019, 12:51 PM	#9
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,619 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Man hell naw. This team has no time to be playing games with a malcontent. It's too hard trying to win games without distractions as it is. jnormand and RailBoss like this.

09-07-2019, 12:53 PM	#10
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320	Re: Antonio Brown...should we? Originally Posted by st thomas I hear ya but Brown is a pre Madonna -dough bag but is good and he won’t be in my locker room ever ever ever. Yea, I mean there is no disputing that. My issue is for weeks now, you've had all the coaches and the organizations talk about how much they supported him over the helmet issue. Then suddenly, a week before the season, you fine him to the point where it voids his guaranteed money. It really just feels like Mayock wanted to display his authority. It feels like mixed messages, and Mayock should have let Gruden decide how to handle it. Not have some sort of weird dick measuring contest. Brown was ready to play, chose a new helmet and everything. Something just feels very wrong with how this was handled. You either tell him to get his ass on the field a few weeks back and say that you were upset with how Brown was handling things, or you let it go. The whole thing is a giant bag of mixed signals . This is not how you run a front office. Loomis would never do this kind of ****. rezburna likes this.
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320