![]() |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Quote:
What did he get... $500,000? Would anybody leave BlackandGold and return to SaintsReport for $500,000? https://66.media.tumblr.com/0421dfe7...rg74o1_400.gif |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
I agree with the initial point.
We have gone back to a similar issue we had before a few years back. If Murray is on the field it's likely a run play. It was like that with Ingram and Ivory a few years back, they're on the field it's run, Sproles is a pass play and only when Pierre Thomas was on the field did they wonder. Its like that now with Murray. |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Ingram is doing well... Good for him.. Murray is fine, just needs to get his touches.
|
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Quote:
2. In a negotiation if you throw out a ridiculous request, you have already decided which route you are going. The ridiculous request is a passive aggressive "I'll only stay for an offer that I can not refuse".. 3. Ingram sulking and not wanting to leave New Orleans doesn't mean he didn't want to be a featured back and decidedly went somewhere where he could get that. Not sure why a large percentage of the commenters want to paint someone as evil or greedy... Business is business and some times both parties settle with neither getting what they truly want. The Saints wanted to keep Ingram, Ingram wanted to be a featured back.... those two ideas do not align. |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Quote:
There was a role built for him in New Orleans and he thrived in it. He was huge in the locker room and loved by the fans. It will be difficult for me to believe anything other than his agent screwed him. His body language was that of a broken man when he left. |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Quote:
I think he's probably more loved in Baltimore now than he was when he was here. |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
I wasn’t a fan of Ingram until Kamara showed up...then it’s like a switch was flipped. He really grew on me after that
|
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
This may have come back into play at some point..
2018 season and PED suspension On May 8, 2018, Ingram was suspended for the first four games of the season due to violating the policy on performance-enhancing drugs.[141] He returned in Week 5 and recorded 53 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns in the 43–19 victory over the Washington Redskins on Monday Night Football.[142] In Week 10 against the Cincinnati Bengals, he had 104 rushing yards, 58 receiving yards, and a receiving touchdown in the 51–14 victory.[143] In Week 11, against the Philadelphia Eagles, he had 103 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.[144] Overall, in the 2018 season, Ingram had 645 rushing yards and six rushing touchdowns to go along with 21 receptions for 170 receiving yards and one receiving touchdown.[145] The Saints won the NFC South and had home-field advantage throughout the NFC Playoffs as the #1-seed.[146] In the Divisional Round against the Philadelphia Eagles, Ingram had 53 rushing yards in the 20–14 victory.[147] In the NFC Championship against the Los Angeles Rams, he had 31 rushing yards in the 26–23 overtime loss.[148] |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
You know who would be good to have?
Devine Ozigbo. |
Re: Losing Ingram was just the dumbest thing we've done as a front office in forever
Quote:
This is my take: Mark started to believe his own hype, his agent believed it as well and they both went all in thinking he was irreplaceable. That body language can be seen walking away from every table in Vegas, someone went all in and lost. I will assume he terminated his agent because his agent did what an agent does, hypes you up and goes for big money. This was Ingram's 3rd contract and he should have known better than to get blind sided. A little history.. Mark Ingram terminated his agent in 2011 just before the draft. In April of 2018 he replaced his agent again.. Now you say a third time..? Then there is this... https://www.baltimoreravens.com/vide...hose-baltimore |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com