Originally Posted by Rueben Mayes (Post 861761)

Just wondering if y'all feel like Kamara is 100% or is the ankle injury a nagging thing that is having residual effects on his game?



He doesn't seem like he's fully healthy but perhaps I am mistaking his lack of production the last few weeks for the opposing teams' defenses loading up on Kamara to force the Saints to use other options?

Originally Posted by 44Champs (Post 861770)

It's obvious that he's not 100%.
I hope they rest him or at least limit his touches. There's a lot of season left and we're gonna need him.

XLIV CHAMPS

Originally Posted by Rueben Mayes (Post 861774)

and use Lat Murray a little bit more or certainly as much as they used him against the Jags to reduce the wear and tear on Kamara!

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 861779)

Bears run D is actually not good. Ours is way way better which is hard to believe.

Originally Posted by st thomas (Post 861782)

Are we facing chase Daniel or troublizki


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Rueben Mayes (Post 861787)

so, it appears to be up in the air right now...



https://heavy.com/sports/2019/10/chi...sky-practices/



out of that article found at the link above, I tried to retrieve the most relevant information(which is vague and non-committal at this point as far as who the starter will be)

"While Nagy was non-committal regarding whether or not Trubisky would start, he did say that his QB1 threw the ball for the first time since getting injured in Week 4. Nagy said he thought Trubisky “looked good,” although his comments seemed to be a good sign for the Bears.



Bears HC Matt Nagy on Mitch Trubisky throwing at Monday's practice: "I thought he looked good."



…Nagy won't commit to Trubisky playing vs. Saints. But if he looks good and there's no setback, there's every reason to expect MT10 will start.



— Rich Campbell (@Rich_Campbell) October 14, 2019



The Bears will face a very tough 5-1 Saints team, and Trubisky still deserves the rest of the season to progress and show what he’s got. Nagy also noted that if Trubisky does start against the Saints Sunday, the quarterback will be game-ready. “You can’t tell somebody to be game ready and not get hit,” he said.



Matt Nagy says that if Mitch Trubisky is cleared to play, then he’s going to be ready to take a hit: "You can’t tell somebody to play a game and not get hit.” #Bears



— Adam Hoge (@AdamHoge) October 14, 2019"

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 861779)

Murray, didn't care for the signing but he did well filling in for the starter last year and this time he has a better line. If he starts it could really mess up Chicago. They have been game planning for Kamara when they might see Murray and a heavy dose of Taysom.

Bears run D is actually not good. Ours is way way better which is hard to believe.

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 861783)

Bears rush D is currently ranked 5th in the league.

They are very good.

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 861792)

They gave up over 150 and 3 TD last game on the ground. I looked at it and against the run they are middle of the road after that game. Technically they are worse than middle of the road against the run looking at the entire body of work.

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 861793)

Beast,

Chicago Defense rank 3rd in points allowed, 6th in total yards allowed, 10th against the pass & 5th in rushing yards allowed. Nothing in those stats say that they are middle of the road after 5 weeks of play on DEFENSE. Nothing.

Source - > Chicago Bears Stats at NFL.com

Source - > https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/stats/...g-type-defense

Source - > https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/team-s...defense&sort=2

They are currently FIRST ON KICK OFF/PUNT RETURN avg.

Source - > https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/team-s...turning&sort=9

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II (Post 861808)

Payton did the very thing he talks about not doing.....he ran Kamara in the ground. Then he kept whipping him until he finished the race. Even sturdy toys get broken.

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 861961)

If he feels he can play and the doctors feel he can play, he needs to play. EVERY game is important. Conference games are very important. At this point of the season there isn't a player that is at 100% ... except, ironically, Drew Brees very soon. If a 75% Kamara can give us a better chance of winning than the alternative then he needs to be in there.

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 861961)

If he feels he can play and the doctors feel he can play, he needs to play. EVERY game is important. Conference games are very important. At this point of the season there isn't a player that is at 100% ... except, ironically, Drew Brees very soon. If a 75% Kamara can give us a better chance of winning than the alternative then he needs to be in there.

Originally Posted by 44Champs (Post 861982)

Are you happy with how Kamara played on Sunday? He had 66 yards on 18 touches and 1 fumble. I know JAX D is good but he makes good defenses look bad when he's healthy. Of course he's going to say he can play and of course the Drs will back him up. But if he's dealing with a high ankle "issue" he's just gonna get worse as the season goes on. We're 5-1 and can afford to rest him right now at least for 1 game.

XLIV CHAMPS

Originally Posted by st thomas (Post 861987)

If y’all want to play in Green Bay or Chicago in January let’s sit him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by 44Champs (Post 861990)

So you dont think we can get HF advantage if we sit him for a week. Just like we wont win a game without Brees.

XLIV CHAMPS

Originally Posted by rezburna (Post 861996)

Suit him up and monitor his touches.

Originally Posted by st thomas (Post 861994)

Decoy him we would go from 2.5 weapons to 1.5 without him. They double Thomas with man on top . He’s corralled if Murray’s in there they will stop the run. Chicago is a bad ass place to play. Teddy hopefully won’t get overwhelmed .how bad is AK ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk