Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Eh, who knows.. maybe people just like to post the most cryptic ****ing tweets possible to cause cardiac arrhythmia in people

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

It's been said & argued but I think we need another receiver. WR or TE...

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Sorry some new blood won't hurt.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

I would be just fine with Coleman out there right now. He was as good or better than anyone else we have on the field today not named Thomas.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Apologize for stating that it looked like AJ was going to be a Saint. The Brian guy should be chased through the streets with a pitchfork.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Loomis is doing his job and I cant muster enough hubris to question it.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Verily I say I could not justify the outrecuidance to bemoan his tactics.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

We are 7-1 with our only loss being the game drew went down in. The defense is playing insane, TE is starting to get in the game and AK will be back next week. No reason to trade away our draft stock for a over priced drama queen.

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Payton don’t stand for drama mommas. Ala Brandon cooks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Loomis ain't doing sqwat
 

Michael Thomas - > 4 rec 36 yards on 7 targets / 0 TD's

"Other guys " ...

Carr 1 catch

TLL 0 catches

J Hill 1 catch

TG Jr 3 catches

Wait, What? The Saints WR1 had 7 targets and caught 4 passes. "Other Guys" accounted for 5 catches. If your WR1 catches 4 and all others catch 5 what's a "Solid WR2" going to catch? 3?