I love it when they play the victim card.

I love it when they delete the offending post.

Was it really completely necessary to start altering / deleting posts after WhoDat said his piece? (i.e. that my actions woudln't be tolerated).

Thanks for the link Scotty... I feel much better now.

Can you find me something on the massive road rage that I have? :mrgreen:

Actually, I could, but wouldn't that take all the fun out of the daily commute?

I have zero tolerance when you refer to one of my mods as an "idiot".

Confused smiley would go great right here .......

You'll see :D (this smiley works)

And I can respect that....however..

Your "mod" felt the need to add something to one of my posts, in some lame effort to be funny. It wasnt' even a situation where my post was abusive, and he had to clean it up..............rather, my post went untouched, and he simply added his little 2 cents at the end of it.

Bear in mind, this was AFTER WhoDat stepped in and said his piece. I did not reply back to WhoDat after he said his piece, so I don't understand the necessity in 08 stepping in to take action. when action wasn't warranted. So you tell me, was that necessary at all?

I anxiously await your reply. Thank you for your time.

The right way to handle the situation: PM me with the information you percieve as crossing the line, and I will work with you in that regard. We're not here to run every person away. We are trying to build a community, here.

The wrong way to handle the situation: type a post and refer to a moderator as an "idiot". This will have a negative effect on how you're viewed by others, even the mods.

If you like, we can continue this conversation in PM, or we can continue it here- it matters not to me.