Saints vs Packers Injury Reports

AsylumGuido · 09-24-2020, 04:19 PM

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI

Agreed; especially with Cam Jordan clearly not being 100%. Is it too early to talk trade candidates?

We've played two games without Davenport and you have Cameron Jordan pegged at being not 100% all the sudden. Have I missed some sort of news on Jordan or is that just your supposition? What do you mean by trade candidates? Trading Cam?

Confused here.

ChrisXVI · 09-24-2020, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

We've played two games without Davenport and you have Cameron Jordan pegged at being not 100% all the sudden. Have I missed some sort of news on Jordan or is that just your supposition? What do you mean by trade candidates? Trading Cam?

Confused here.

Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.)

No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick.

AsylumGuido · 09-24-2020, 05:23 PM

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI

Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.)

No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick.

Okay. Got you. Last I heard he was full go. Hope that proves to be true. That said, a mid round pick would get you what at this point? Nothing much I would imagine since everyone is looking for pressure help right now.

jnormand · 09-24-2020, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI

Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.)

No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick.

Maybe that's why they were looking at Clowney. They knew Cam wasn't gonna be 100%.

Regardless, if he's in there he needs to be better. Or give the reps to one of the new guys. Like the rapist we have...can't remember his name.

ChrisXVI · 09-24-2020, 09:08 PM

Originally Posted by jnormand

Maybe that's why they were looking at Clowney. They knew Cam wasn't gonna be 100%.

Regardless, if he's in there he needs to be better. Or give the reps to one of the new guys. Like the rapist we have...can't remember his name.

100% on the Clowney thing. Cam Jordan is looking stiff as hell and at his age it’s possible he doesn’t fully bounce back.

09-24-2020, 04:19 PM	#1
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Saints vs Packers Injury Reports Originally Posted by ChrisXVI Agreed; especially with Cam Jordan clearly not being 100%. Is it too early to talk trade candidates? We've played two games without Davenport and you have Cameron Jordan pegged at being not 100% all the sudden. Have I missed some sort of news on Jordan or is that just your supposition? What do you mean by trade candidates? Trading Cam? Confused here.

09-24-2020, 05:13 PM	#2
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: Saints vs Packers Injury Reports Originally Posted by AsylumGuido We've played two games without Davenport and you have Cameron Jordan pegged at being not 100% all the sudden. Have I missed some sort of news on Jordan or is that just your supposition? What do you mean by trade candidates? Trading Cam? Confused here. Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.) No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick. Rugby Saint II likes this.

09-24-2020, 05:23 PM	#3
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Saints vs Packers Injury Reports Originally Posted by ChrisXVI Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.) No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick. Okay. Got you. Last I heard he was full go. Hope that proves to be true. That said, a mid round pick would get you what at this point? Nothing much I would imagine since everyone is looking for pressure help right now. ChrisXVI likes this.

09-24-2020, 08:35 PM	#4
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,760	Re: Saints vs Packers Injury Reports Originally Posted by ChrisXVI Cam Jordan is clearly not 100% after his offseason surgery. And no, he is not being doubled all the time. He’s losing a lot of his reps to nobody tackles (and one-on-ones with TE’s.) No, not trading Cam. I’m just talking about bringing in someone for a mid-round pick. Maybe that's why they were looking at Clowney. They knew Cam wasn't gonna be 100%. Regardless, if he's in there he needs to be better. Or give the reps to one of the new guys. Like the rapist we have...can't remember his name. jeanpierre and ChrisXVI like this.

09-24-2020, 09:08 PM	#5
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: Saints vs Packers Injury Reports Originally Posted by jnormand Maybe that's why they were looking at Clowney. They knew Cam wasn't gonna be 100%. Regardless, if he's in there he needs to be better. Or give the reps to one of the new guys. Like the rapist we have...can't remember his name. 100% on the Clowney thing. Cam Jordan is looking stiff as hell and at his age it’s possible he doesn’t fully bounce back. jnormand likes this.