Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Everything Else

Closure of Border Patrol stations across four states triggers alarm

this is a discussion within the Everything Else Community Forum; The Obama administration is moving to shut down nine Border Patrol stations across four states, triggering a backlash from local law enforcement, members of Congress and Border Patrol agents themselves. Critics of the move warn the closures will undercut efforts ...

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Danno

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2012, 08:48 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,808
Blog Entries: 27
Closure of Border Patrol stations across four states triggers alarm

The Obama administration is moving to shut down nine Border Patrol stations across four states, triggering a backlash from local law enforcement, members of Congress and Border Patrol agents themselves.
Critics of the move warn the closures will undercut efforts to intercept drug and human traffickers in well-traveled corridors north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Though the affected stations are scattered throughout northern and central Texas, and three other states, the coverage areas still see plenty of illegal immigrant activity -- one soon-to-be-shuttered station in Amarillo, Texas, is right in the middle of the I-40 corridor; another in Riverside, Calif., is outside Los Angeles.



U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it's closing the stations in order to reassign agents to high-priority areas closer to the border.
"These deactivations are consistent with the strategic goal of securing America's borders, and our objective of increasing and sustaining the certainty of arrest of those trying to enter our country illegally," CBP spokesman Bill Brooks said in a statement. "By redeploying and reallocating resources at or near the border, CBP will maximize the effectiveness of its enforcement mandate and align our investments with our mission."
But at least one Border Patrol supervisor in Texas has called on local officers to "voice your concerns" to elected officials, warning that the "deactivation" will remove agents from the Texas Panhandle, among other places. Several members of Congress have asked Border Patrol Chief Michael Fisher to reconsider the plan. And local officials are getting worried about what will happen once the Border Patrol leaves town, since they rely on those federal officials to assist in making immigration arrests.
"It could impact us tremendously since we've only got two agents up here now for 26 counties," Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas told FoxNews.com.
Potter County, in the Texas Panhandle, would be affected by the planned closure of the Amarillo station.
Thomas said that while his area is far from the border, it's still a major "corridor" for illegal immigrants -- and he said his office depends on Border Patrol to respond to their calls.
"I can't hold a carload of people out there on I-40 for eight hours while somebody comes from El Paso," he said. "I mean, that's just crazy."
Border Patrol's resident agent in charge in Amarillo expressed similar worries, in a recent memo to local law enforcement alerting them to the planned closure. The official, Robert Green, warned that the "entire complement" of two agents would be reassigned from Amarillo to somewhere closer to the border. He said "there is no active plan" right now for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to fill the void on assisting local officials with stops.
SUMMARY
The following Border Patrol stations are set for closure:
Texas: Lubbock, Amarillo, Dallas, San Angelo, Abilene and San Antonio.
Idaho: Twin Falls
Montana: Billings
California: Riverside
Empathizing with local officials, he wrote: "As a former deputy I found myself on the other end of the radio hoping to contact USBP to assist me with a vehicle full of undocumented foreign nationals on the side of the road."
And in an unusual plea, he urged the recipients of his memo to contact elected officials about the change. "I would encourage you, if you have found USBP assistance valuable in the past, to contact your political representatives and voice your concerns," Green wrote.
The letter was first posted online by the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. Thomas confirmed to FoxNews.com that he received it. Bob Dane, communications director with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, also said he's confirmed the letter's authenticity with ICE.
CBP later acknowledged the memo, but said in its statement that Green was expressing his "personal opinion."
Lawmakers have started to get involved. Republican Rep. Mac Thornberry, who represents Amarillo, joined two other Texas lawmakers whose districts would be affected in asking the Border Patrol chief to "reconsider the proposal."
A letter sent Tuesday to Fisher warned the plan would "leave our area vulnerable." They noted that the Amarillo and Lubbock stations alone, two of those affected, accounted for 638 apprehensions of illegal immigrants just this year.
FAIR also blasted the Obama administration for the plans.
"It's part of the systematic dismantling of both border and interior enforcement," Dane told FoxNews.com. "It complements the non-enforcement policy of this administration."


Read more: Closure of Border Patrol stations across four states triggers alarm | Fox News

Said Pope Benedict: "WOW ... that ring is bigger than mine!!!"

SmashMouth is online now  
Latest Blogs
REFUND Last Blog: 12-07-2014 By: xan




Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


Old 07-11-2012, 08:24 AM   #2
evil decepticon
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 583
Damn, they've been trying to close that Riverside station for several years.
sharke is offline  
Old 07-11-2012, 02:52 PM   #3
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 11,259
Blog Entries: 5
A reasonable person can easily figure out why this is being done.
saintfan is offline  
Old 07-11-2012, 06:06 PM   #4
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort Alabama
Posts: 17,081
Originally Posted by saintfan View Post
A reasonable person can easily figure out why this is being done.

Will they be replaced with voting booths manned by local community organizers?
saintfan likes this.
Danno is online now  
Old 07-12-2012, 12:13 AM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 18,903
Man this crazy time in a crazy world.
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:09 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,808
Blog Entries: 27
The one thing that makes you wonder is that all of the aforementioned cities are nowhere near a border. One would think that a border patrol station might be located within at least walking or biking distance from an actual border. It reminds me of my drive back from South Padre Island when I drove up on a border patrol station 100 miles in from the USA/Mexican border. While we all were completely on US soil, we had to show identification, but subjected to a possible vehicular search and so on. Which reminds me, what part of identification credentials does our illustrious AG, Eric Holder, object to again?

Said Pope Benedict: "WOW ... that ring is bigger than mine!!!"

SmashMouth is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts