|
|||||||
this is a discussion within the NOLA Community Forum; I've noticed a trend the last couple of years in which games are being stopped when a player reaches some landmark record or whatever. I know I have seen this several times - most recently with Emmitt when he took ...
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (aka Southern Canada)
Posts: 1,671
|
In-game Celebrations
I've noticed a trend the last couple of years in which games are being stopped when a player reaches some landmark record or whatever. I know I have seen this several times - most recently with Emmitt when he took the all-time-yardage lead.
I have to say that I don't like this trend. I think it puts too much emphasis on the record which is important to the history of the NFL, but not to the game itself. I would be much happier with a post game ceremony honoring the person for his achievement rather than interrupting a game to do so. Anyone disagree? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
In-game Celebrations
They did it for Walter... I see no problem with it. They stopped the game for Cal Ripken too. I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (aka Southern Canada)
Posts: 1,671
|
In-game Celebrations
You would!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
In-game Celebrations
Yeah, just like you would be the guy in favor of stricter rules that allow for fewer rights!! LMAO.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|