Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

How many times before Carney goes?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2005, 11:26 AM   #21
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:29 AM   #22
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.
Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me.

I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear?

\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse


\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\"
he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"
WhoDat is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:33 AM   #23
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 600
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.
Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out:


Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over..

Thanks pal.
TheGambler is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:35 AM   #24
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Someone gets it.
WhoDat is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:36 AM   #25
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me.

I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear?
Does that go the same for the Brooks walks on water theme?

I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board
Not even remotely true. Like I said, be honest and it really wouldn't be a problem with me. That seems to get harder as these accusations go on.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:37 AM   #26
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by TheGambler
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.
Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out:


Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over..

Thanks pal.
And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:43 AM   #27
Kinder, gentler
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.
What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads.
BlackandBlue is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:45 AM   #28
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 600
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.
If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks.

Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours.
TheGambler is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:51 AM   #29
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by BlackandBlue
am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.
What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads.
You're about the most consistent guy I know on this board BandB. Even in the face of using your avatar to "come out" to everyone.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-03-2005, 11:52 AM   #30
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by TheGambler
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.
If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks.

Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours.
Then you must miss the guy who makes threads in an attempt to deflect blame from Brooks at every shot. I call BS on you not seeing this. With a little less respect though.
saintswhodi is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts