Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints


this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Yo Kool, good to see ya. A whole lotta love has been sprouting around here. Ignore the new designated harasser on this thread. ~~~let's catch up sometime...

Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2006, 04:48 PM   #41
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
Yo Kool, good to see ya. A whole lotta love has been sprouting around here. Ignore the new designated harasser on this thread. ~~~let's catch up sometime
LKelley67 is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 07:59 PM   #42
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,417
RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

SFIAH, Kelley, and BMG,

Good to hear from you guys. I think I may be around a bit more now that there is something goin' on to talk about (and my own work load is decreased).

BMG, I'll check out the thread, but off the top I don't think we have the personel for a 3-4, especially since we let Howard go (we could have used Smith as a Rush End before).

Now that I'm thinking about it a bit, maybe it is the plan to draft Young or Leinhart still. Brees could groom them and maintain until then. Bennett had a 1,000 yard season not that long ago - he'll be a plenty good threat when Duece gets hurt again. I like it.

I'm not really sold on Brees yet, and everyone know I've been a Brooks defender in the past; however, I'm glad to see some move by the FO (and not simple back up moves), that is what I am truly glad for.

In the end, I suppose it'll be awhile before the "Brooks takes over threads" thing goes away, eh?

"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks :cool:
JKool is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 08:33 PM   #43
Site Donor 2016
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,713
Blog Entries: 3
RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

Billy is that you? I knew you would make it back sooner or later.

Good to hear from ya Kool.
CheramieIII is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 09:07 PM   #44
100th Post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Smithdale M.S.
Posts: 107
Re: RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

Originally Posted by fatz6179
yea h I agree he'll get back-up to the top and kick ass
When has he ever been on top?Oh yeah did'nt he lead the nfl in fumbles or was it backword passes I forget. One more thing how old are you?
TIGERSAINT31 is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 09:09 PM   #45
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,403
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

Tiger, he can't be older than 20, but who knows, he could be a kid with nothing to do.
LongTimeFan is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 05:17 AM   #46
500th Post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belleview, FL
Posts: 526
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

who ever this joker is...i have seen 3rd graders who write better than him.
jergensl is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 12:46 PM   #47
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scott, LA
Posts: 951
Blog Entries: 12
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: FO? WTF?

To settle the Brees thing, I'll say this. I'm a Charger fan (2nd behind the Saints, of course). Did anyone watch the game last year when they upset the Colts and handed Peyton and his crew their first loss of the regular season? Everyone anticipated the Chargers' running game to score on the Colts and, had Tomlinson been shut down, the Chargers would lose. Well, Tomlinson WAS shut down. Granted, it was the Chargers' defense that won the game, someone had to score points and move down the field. It may have been ugly, but Brees did it.

Besides, how can Antonio Gates be so dominant? Someone has to throw him the football correctly.

As far as Bennett goes, I do recall him torching the Saints in a couple of games. He also did me pretty good in Fantasy Football as well.
BoudinSandwich is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 01:02 PM   #48
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
Billy was more eloquent than that. I bet he could even do jive talk better than that also. LOL

I see him over in one of the other forums. With Brooks being history now he might actually be a pleasant pot stirrer now. Whaddya think?
LKelley67 is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 01:15 PM   #49
LB Mentallity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,872
Blog Entries: 68
We gambled on Brees done deal. We have an out next year if it does not work. I can deal with it.
Bennett is another gamble i will take. He is very good in the spread offense. Problem can our WR stop dropping the ball and force D's out of the 8 in the box against us for a change. Lets not talk about the OL here. Brees throws a good ball to backs out of the back field. If Duce goes down we do not have a back that can run inbetween the T now. That is my big worry.

"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
hagan714 is offline  
Old 03-19-2006, 03:37 PM   #50
500th Post
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alexandria, Louisiana
Posts: 665
I agree hagan. If deuce goes down we hve no one between the tackles, I know the FO likes Keith Joseph but I know nothing about the guy...I really think they should hold onto Smith or Thomas
jrmllb is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.

Copyright 1997 - 2018 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts