Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

just saw this

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; i just checked it jim that would work as far as the points. i am not sure we could count onit but it would work. either way i would take the trade...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2006, 09:31 PM   #11
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,099
i just checked it jim that would work as far as the points. i am not sure we could count onit but it would work. either way i would take the trade
spkb25 is offline  
Latest Blogs
REFUND Last Blog: 12-07-2014 By: xan




Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


Old 04-21-2006, 09:33 PM   #12
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Thibodaux, La
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by spkb25
i just checked it jim that would work as far as the points. i am not sure we could count onit but it would work. either way i would take the trade
Not bad...we move down from 2, still get our guy, and get 2 extra second rounders. Thats not to say the Packers would do it which would be another key question...but thanks for checking on the point system for me.
JimBone is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 09:41 PM   #13
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,751
Blog Entries: 40
RE: just saw this

1. bush
2 young -Williams
3 matt ---DBrick
4 Dbrick-Matt
5 Williams-AJ
6 Davis---Davis
7 AJ------?
Worse case VY falls, we miss out so trade down agaian for one of the left-overs Ngata, Bunkley, Huff, Justice, not bad. I hope they throw in a 1 st next year for this deal.
1, 2(38), 1(2007)= 2020 + 800= 2820
AJ, Dbrick,Davis not in a saints uniform would hurt though. But to numb the pain get 2s. Maybe denver will save us.
1,2(37)=1580
1(15), 2(34), 2(37), 2(38) plus 1(2007) for Quinn
1- Chad Greenway, Jimmy Williams
34 - Nick Mangold, Davin Joseph,
37 - Abdul Hodge, Eric Winston
38 - John McCargo, Max Jean-Gilles
food for thought

There is a "Report Post" button underneath everyone's avatar.
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought an idiot, than to open it and remove all doubt!!!!!
hagan714 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 09:41 PM   #14
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,099
well we would get one extra 2nd and by trading the third we wouldn't have a third. we would still have three first day picks and that would be out of the first 38 picks. not to bad in my opinion. i am not sure that will happen but we can dream can't we. like i said either way i would love the trade with the raiders
spkb25 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 09:57 PM   #15
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12
hey guys, I would love to see us deal with the Raiders, but there is no way Hawk is a Saint if we make the move. It would either be Huff or Davis that is still on the board at 7. If you make the move, you might as well trade down again to stockpile more picks.
HOUSTONSAINT is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 10:02 PM   #16
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,099
i disagree you might as well trade down again. you already secure the 34 and 38th in the second. you also add the raiders third which would be the 69th. i wouldn't take davis but huff for sure. then you stil;l have three other picks on the first day. this isn't a sprint
spkb25 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 10:28 PM   #17
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,751
Blog Entries: 40
let's see oaklands 1, 2, 3 = 1500 + 520 + 245 = 2265 plus a 2 0r a 3 in 2007. that would gut this years draft for them. 1,2 and a 1 next year seems more likely. As for Huff I like his game but if some one wants him and we can get one of the DT or the second best of: OT, LB, CB, in the draft plus picks I would do it. Besides that would also give you a fair shot at Chad Jackson also the best WR in the draft.
Davis over Huff all day long at 7

There is a "Report Post" button underneath everyone's avatar.
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought an idiot, than to open it and remove all doubt!!!!!
hagan714 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 10:42 PM   #18
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,099
what is a first next year worth. i am not sure but i would take that. so you get three first day picks 7,34,38. then you also get a first next year for sure. especially because if they are looking at vince or matt they aren't going to make the playoffs probably which means you probably get a top 15 next year. they would have to throw in a 4rth or 5th this year i think
spkb25 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 10:48 PM   #19
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,099
they would have to give us their first this year second this year and fourth this year and then their first next year if it was worth 400- 500 . that would work
spkb25 is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 11:01 PM   #20
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,751
Blog Entries: 40
Next year first rounder are given a flat 800 pt value. 400 pts. is the flat value given to the second round picks
hagan714 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts