Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Losing

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Some do not hate him , some just think he looks a lot like 3,855 Jim Everett, 1994 (540 att.- 346 comp.) 3,832 Aaron Brooks, 2001 (558 att.-312 comp.) Or should we say Chris ..... :P 08 -- I\'ve even ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2003, 10:46 AM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 842
Losing

Some do not hate him , some just think he looks a lot like

3,855 Jim Everett, 1994 (540 att.- 346 comp.)
3,832 Aaron Brooks, 2001 (558 att.-312 comp.)

Or should we say Chris ..... :P
08 -- I\'ve even come to respect your opinion on some things. But, Brooks aint\' one of \'em. I consider you to be the ring leader of the Brooks haters...

I\'m aware of Jim Everett\'s career. You can compare Brooks to Everette if ya want, but just never compare him to Jake Delhomme.
BillyC is offline  
Latest Blogs
2015 Saints Bye Week Draft Last Blog: 10-16-2014 By: hagan714


"IRONY" Last Blog: 10-01-2014 By: teddybarexxx


Sainity Zone 9-30-14 Hail Last Blog: 09-30-2014 By: xan


Old 12-23-2003, 04:24 PM   #22
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
Losing

You can compare Brooks to Everette if ya want, but just never compare him to Jake Delhomme.

Aaron brooks first year rating 76.4

Jake Delhomme first year rating 80.5

I see your point Billy ............

[Edited on 23/12/2003 by saintz08]
saintz08 is offline  
Old 12-23-2003, 04:41 PM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 842
Losing

Jake has thown only 2 more TD\'s than In\'ts so far. His interceptions may catch up to his TD\'s next week.
BillyC is offline  
Old 12-23-2003, 06:30 PM   #24
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,762
Losing

It\'s nice to have folks that are unbiased.
Thank You. I\'m glad to offer a balanced view.

I enjoy reading everyone\'s opinions, but there are some like B&B, LummOx, Danno, saint5221, (and I\'m sure there a couple more) that call it like they see it. I don\'t always agree with those guys on everything, but they tell it like it is, without any agenda.
Again, thank you, I just try to comment on things as they are. I do think LummOx offers the most baseline viewpoint though.
BrooksMustGo is offline  
Old 12-23-2003, 06:38 PM   #25
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
Losing

His interceptions may catch up to his TD\'s next week.
Quarterbacks Daunte Culpepper of Minnesota, Jake Delhomme of Caroloina, Brett Favre of Green Bay and Steve McNair of Tennessee are the finalists for FedEx Express NFL Player of the Week honors for games played on December 21-22.

Pretty good company for the month of December .........

Biggest stat

Delhomme - Play offs
Brooks - Not .....
saintz08 is offline  
Old 12-23-2003, 06:56 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 842
Losing

Biggest stat

Delhomme - Play offs
Brooks - Not .....

Here\'s a better stat for you 08 :

Jake Delhomme -- Playoffs
Deuce McAllister -- Not


Individual award:
Aaron Brooks -- Pro Bowl Alternate
Jake Delhomme -- NOT

You\'re at the plate 08, bottom of the 9th, 3 balls and 2 strikes. Don\'t miss!!! :P


BMG -- You\'re welcome man. We actually see a lot of things alike. Soon as you lose your hate for Brooks, we\'ll be like 2 peas in a pod. -- :P
BillyC is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 01:36 AM   #27
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
Losing

Here\'s a better stat for you 08 :

Jake Delhomme -- Playoffs
Deuce McAllister -- Not


Individual award:
Aaron Brooks -- Pro Bowl Alternate
Jake Delhomme -- NOT
The Pro Bowl , a game played that bases it\'s players on stats and popularity .

That pitch was slow and over the plate .
The swing is true and the ball is out of the park .

What did he hit that weak pitch with ???

Duece\'s own words :

\"My biggest concern is wins and loses. Until then, the records don\'t mean anything. What matter is getting in the playoffs and winning the Super Bowl. Until you do that, it doesn\'t matter how many records you hold.\"

Let\'s go to the replay .

What matter is getting in the playoffs and winning the Super Bowl. Until you do that, it doesn\'t matter how many records you hold.\"


\"Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn\'t give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed.\" - George S. Patton
On another note, I\'ll take a bite of that crow 08. - Saintfan
Brooks is a moron!! - Halo
saintz08 is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 11:02 AM   #28
jm
100th Post
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 133
Losing

The only stat that counts is wins and losses

currently as a starter for the Saints Brooks is 27 - 27 including the playoff win. I don\'t know what Bobby Hebert or Jeff Blakes win losses as a starter are, perhaps someone could shed some light on the subject.

Just presenting the facts !
jm is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 11:35 AM   #29
Faqda Falcons
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ruston, Louisiana
Posts: 3,464
Blog Entries: 3
Losing

Not sure about Hebert, but Blake in his only year as the Saints starter went 7-4 before going down with the injury that led to his demise. Brooks then went 4-3 the rest of the season (including the 2 playoff games that year). Does anyone ever wonder what could\'ve been if Jeff Blake hadn\'t been screwed out of his starting job? Not that I\'m bashing Brooks, but he was handed the starting job on a silver platter that belonged to someone else.
D_it_up is offline  
Old 12-24-2003, 11:40 AM   #30
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 842
Losing

Not that I\'m bashing Brooks, but he was handed the starting job on a silver platter that belonged to someone else.
I was under the impression that they gave the job based on Brooks play when he came in for an injuried Jeff Blake. Players lose their job all the time like that. Boo Williams is likely to be our starting tightend next year. That\'s the way the cookie crumbles.......

[Edited on 24/12/2003 by BillyC]
BillyC is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts