Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Does anyone think if Ingram had played, the outcome would have been different?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I think it would have made a difference but I'm not sure it would have turned the game....

Like Tree2Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2011, 05:56 PM   #21
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Toilet of Idaho
Posts: 1,899
I think it would have made a difference but I'm not sure it would have turned the game.
jnormand is offline  
Latest Blogs
The ArtiChoke Last Blog: 09-18-2014 By: Barry from MS


How to really handle Ray Rice and AP Last Blog: 09-17-2014 By: neugey


The Lost Art of the Trade Last Blog: 08-30-2014 By: jeanpierre


Old 11-01-2011, 07:23 PM   #22
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 7,170
Originally Posted by strato View Post
I read where Carmichael called the first half and Payton the second?..geez here i am again posting about that dam game..lol..must back away....
So does that mean running in the 4th quarter was Sean's fault?
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 11-01-2011, 07:33 PM   #23
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 3,487
NOPE, woudln't have mattered who was in there.
Mardigras9 is offline  
Old 11-01-2011, 08:00 PM   #24
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,506
Blog Entries: 4
Told ya - "I bet Carmichael called the game"
saintsfan1976 is offline  
Old 11-01-2011, 08:13 PM   #25
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 937
It wouldn't have made a difference...unless it made the team more determined and changed the way we called offensive plays.
jcp026 is offline  
Old 11-01-2011, 08:14 PM   #26
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,506
Blog Entries: 4
Not unless he coached.
saintsfan1976 is offline  
Old 11-01-2011, 11:13 PM   #27
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,530
no
Ashley is offline  
Old 11-02-2011, 07:14 PM   #28
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,253
Absolutely not.
Marlboro Man is offline  
Old 11-03-2011, 02:28 PM   #29
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 823
I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids.
JoanieNTX is offline  
Old 11-03-2011, 02:46 PM   #30
"Do Your Job!!"
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mid City, New Orleans
Posts: 1,753
Originally Posted by JoanieNTX View Post
I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids.
Chris Ivory could have filled that role. They were to scared he would hurt himself again. It was a failure from the top down. We need to win any way possible and they blew it by not using our top pounder. You can't expect much when the guy runs 1 time and goes to the sideline.
CharityMike is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/37743-does-anyone-think-if-ingram-had-played-outcome-would-have-been-different.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Does anyone think if Ingram had played, the outcome would have been different? This thread Refback 11-01-2011 05:18 PM 2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts