Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

There's no $$$ at all for this and if there was I'd still rather it be spent on the D, but wouldn't Welker in the slot and Sproles running out the other side be fun to watch? That's not even mentioning everyone else we have. Teams'd need twelve men on the field just to try to cover everything.

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

So replace Lance Moore with Welker?

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

No, two's better than one. Remember, this is a just thinkin' about it thread. By 2014 the downsides would outweigh the up, but I'm just thinkin' it would be plain fun to see Welker and Brees and the rest on the same team just once.

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

I'm with Danno on this one we have a Wes welker, his name is lance Moore!!!!

As far as fun, Greg Jennings would be a hellva add. Jimmy, Colston, Morgan, Moore......... and Jennings...that would be fun...

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

Welker is good but with a lesser QB...I don't see it.

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

Jennings would be the bomb. he can get yacs like no one else.its almost imposible to get gennings without money. It would be fun
.

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

I see Welker as a bit quicker and much craftier at getting open, but heck with him. How about Megatron?

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

Welker drops the big time catches that need to be made, lance moore doesnt

Greg jennings would be perfect for our offense but someone would see a very reduced role and we are already loaded up to the eye balls in offensive talent

Dont forget that nick toon will be back this year and if he stays healthy, he could turn into a very reliable option

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

I think a player like Ngata, Aldon Smith, Patrick Willis or Clay Matthews would be much much more fun.

Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
 

Man, nine posts into this silly thread....Are we ready for some football or what?