this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; No, this isn't a fire sale you're witnessing in New Orleans. The New Orleans Saints aren't succumbing to the salary cap. It wouldn't even be accurate to say they're in a rebuilding mode this offseason. Because much of the new ...
||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|03-13-2014, 05:28 PM||#1|
Rating: (0 votes - average)
No, this isn't a fire sale you're witnessing in New Orleans.
The New Orleans Saints aren't succumbing to the salary cap.
It wouldn't even be accurate to say they're in a rebuilding mode this offseason. Because much of the new foundation is already in place.
The Saints have remained perennial Super Bowl contenders because they haven't allowed themselves to be paralyzed by their salary-cap predicament.
Instead, they've continued to aggressively spend money in free agency in recent years on new core leaders such as cornerback Keenan Lewis, linebacker Curtis Lofton and guard Ben Grubbs -- not to mention running back Darren Sproles when he arrived in 2011.
And they'll likely make one or two similar investments in free agency this year.
Of course it's difficult -- for the fan base and the organization alike -- to see the Saints part ways with so many of their all-time great players. The Saints' recent news releases have read more like the induction of a Ring of Honor class than a series of roster cuts: Lance Moore, Will Smith, Jonathan Vilma, Roman Harper and Jabari Greer, with Sproles reportedly next.
But the Saints haven't been forced into any of these moves. They've been tough but calculated decisions, made when the Saints feel a player's value no longer matches his salary.
And if anything, the team should be applauded for the way it has planned ahead for these departures.
I'm not saying I love every move the Saints have made. I'm especially leery about the decision to part with Sproles, who will be much harder to replace than anyone else on the list, even if he is starting to slow down at age 30.
I was equally leery about the decision to let left tackle Jermon Bushrod get away last year, since New Orleans didn't have a proven alternative in-house. But I appreciate that those decisions were value-based.
It's also worth noting that Bushrod is the only example that comes close to the Saints being burned by a decision to let go of one of their core veteran players during the tenure of general manager Mickey Loomis and coach Sean Payton.
"We're always trying to improve our team," Loomis said earlier this offseason, when I asked him about the way the Saints have stayed aggressive in free agency in recent years despite their cap limitations. "I think the biggest challenge of that is that you just can't afford to make many mistakes. That your margin for error is decreased."
Every year, people tend to determine the free agency "winners" and "losers" by the size of the haul.
But the Saints deserve credit for making so many choices that have panned out in recent years despite such a slim margin for error.
"It's exceptionally hard to do," said Bill Polian, the ESPN analyst and a former longtime general manager who raved last month about the job that Loomis and Payton have done in recent years to continually reshape the roster.
"It is this kind of cap management when you're a good team, a contending team, that is most valuable. And in almost every case it goes unnoticed," Polian said. "[Teams like the Saints that] continue to add good players deserve a great deal of credit."
Polian knows of what he speaks, having previously managed the Indianapolis Colts with quarterback Peyton Manning as their high-priced centerpiece.
The Saints made quarterback Drew Brees the first NFL player to make $20 million per year in 2011. In turn, they entered each of the past two offseasons at more than $10 million over the salary cap.
And now they're poised to make free agent Jimmy Graham the highest-paid tight end in NFL history -- likely more than $10 million per year. But I still expect the Saints to keep an aggressive eye on the open market, as they have in recent years.
To do so, Loomis and his staff have had to become masters in mathematics, continually restructuring contracts and back-loading deals to push cap costs into future years.
Sure, the Saints are just delaying the inevitable. But they figure they can wait to pay those bills whenever Brees retires. Their window of opportunity to win titles is now.
Not all NFL teams like to approach the cap that way. The Green Bay Packers, especially, have never liked to spend big in free agency. And former Packers executive Andrew Brandt, currently an NFL business analyst, has pointed to the way the Saints back-loaded Brees' contract as a reason for all of these recent veteran cuts.
"I was, and am, much more conservative," Brandt said recently. "You know, having Brett Favre all those years, I never wanted to leave the team with a big hole based on pro-ration of an old contract. ... You're always going to be either releasing veteran players and/or doing these cap restructures that put more pressure on the future. They're gonna continue to have challenges. I don't think they can continue to be aggressive.
"But they've got this window. And if they keep deleting and pushing out cap, I guess they can."
One thing both Brandt and Polian agreed on is that the Saints, led by Loomis and Payton, have been successful with recent choices made in both free agency and the draft. Player personnel director Ryan Pace, college scouting director Rick Reiprish and football administration director Khai Harley -- as well as others in the front office -- also deserve plenty of credit for that.
The Saints' success with personnel decisions was never more evident than last month, when they bid farewell to longtime defensive greats Smith, Vilma, Greer and Harper. Those moves didn't hurt too much, because their replacements -- Lewis, Lofton and recent first-round draft picks Cameron Jordan and Kenny Vaccaro -- are already in-house.
Now the Saints are hoping that emerging young offense playmakers such as Mark Ingram, Khiry Robinson and Kenny Stills can help fill the voids left by Sproles and Moore.
Perhaps they're playing with fire. But that's not the same thing as a fire sale.
New Orleans Saints haven't become a cap casualty - ESPN
|03-13-2014, 10:47 PM||#3|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Re: Saints haven't become a cap casualty
Thats why I'm not worried. When I heard that The Saints were going to still be aggressive despite being over the old salary cap, I knew Mickey and Sean would do what was needed.
|03-14-2014, 05:04 AM||#4|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Blog Entries: 52
Re: Saints haven't become a cap casualty
everyone feel better now. it is official do not panic it there on the news stand. just what most of have been saying for two years now.
lesson learned we hope
#1 do not take such great risks on the OL
that is it so far.
question still to be answered
- did they learn lesson #1
- Can we replace at least 80% of Sproiles production?
answer coming in 2015
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/64830-saints-havent-become-cap-casualty.html
|The Latest New Orleans Saints News (Black and Gold) | SportSpyder||This thread||Refback||03-14-2014 05:25 AM||1|
|The Latest Keenan Lewis News | SportSpyder||This thread||Refback||03-13-2014 08:33 PM||3|
|The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder||This thread||Refback||03-13-2014 08:21 PM||4|
|Brickleberries Articles | SportSpyder||This thread||Refback||03-13-2014 06:11 PM||1|
|Saints haven't become a cap casualty||This thread||Refback||03-13-2014 06:02 PM||99|
|The Latest NFL News | SportSpyder||This thread||Refback||03-13-2014 05:47 PM||1|