Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Brandon Coleman not safe!

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I really hope no player is safe in training camp. Best player makes the roster, names shouldn't mean anything. That said, I think Coleman will make the team, if that means the Saints carry 6 WR's, I think they will....

Like Tree14Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2016, 01:01 PM   #11
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 2,540
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

I really hope no player is safe in training camp. Best player makes the roster, names shouldn't mean anything.

That said, I think Coleman will make the team, if that means the Saints carry 6 WR's, I think they will.
K Major likes this.
Utah_Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 01:11 PM   #12
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, Alabama
Posts: 21,145
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Originally Posted by hagan714 View Post
the saints wont keep 6?

WR is all up in the air and young so if the talent is there why not?
We have before, but we had a pretty solid O-line the too. I'm afraid our questions along the O-line will require us to keep an extra OL or two. That spot will rob us of that 6th WR or that 5th RB, or 3rd TE, or 3rd QB.
Rugby Saint II likes this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 02:24 PM   #13
ChocolateMilk Connoisseur
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Live Free or Die
Posts: 362
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

we've often kept only 2 qb's, i can see that as a real possibility again
maximkat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 03:37 PM   #14
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,839
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Originally Posted by maximkat View Post
we've often kept only 2 qb's, i can see that as a real possibility again
in the past no one wanted our third so we could stash him on the PS. We won't be able to do that this year, so if GG is not ready to backup Brees we'll need to carry 3.

It will be a lot easier to keep the FA o-linemen on the practice squad, as someone signing one of them without seeing them in camp would be a real reach
halloween 65 likes this.
ScottF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:42 PM   #15
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 4,245
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Originally Posted by ScottF View Post
in the past no one wanted our third so we could stash him on the PS. We won't be able to do that this year, so if GG is not ready to backup Brees we'll need to carry 3.

It will be a lot easier to keep the FA o-linemen on the practice squad, as someone signing one of them without seeing them in camp would be a real reach
I'm hoping Greyson takes a huge step forward so we could carry only 2. I don't think we could stash him either.
halloween 65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 01:33 PM   #16
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 14,355
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Coleman is about as safe as Cadet. Maybe a little safer. It will all come down to the level of competition at training camp.
Rugby Saint II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 04:31 PM   #17
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,839
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Agree, We will likely only keep 5.

With Harris coming on strong and Cooks, Snead guaranteed spots...

1. Cooks
2. Snead
3. Thomas

That leaves 2 spots for the final 5. Those spots typically are filled with WR's who play ST's. Coleman doesn't.

So he's competing with veteran Vincent Brown and upstart RJ Harris.

I still think he has the inside track, but he'd better turn it up a notch.
Harris could slide to PS no problem, and no one really wanted Brown, so I don't think we are in much danger if we play the cut and sign game with them.
Coleman might be more attractive.
I think since he was the go to guy last game of the year that SP sees something
ScottF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 06:53 PM   #18
Site Donor 2016
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,521
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

Good. Means we are strong at that position.
The Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 12:42 AM   #19
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 22,413
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

If you want to get paid, step up.
QBREES9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 02:46 AM   #20
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,465
Re: Brandon Coleman not safe!

I agree. It took Meachem 3 years to be any good and if Coleman can't do it this year then it's next man up.
Marlboro Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/78525-brandon-coleman-not-safe.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Brandon Coleman not safe! This thread Refback 06-22-2016 08:18 PM 5
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 06-22-2016 07:25 PM 10


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts