Not sure what move you are talking about concerning Galette? There were several events connected to Galette. I certainly wouldn't have signed him to an extension knowing what we all know about him now. I'm sure the Saints front office agrees. Too bad we can't see into the future. Or is it the move of cutting him? While it wasn't all they could have done, it was the best PR move. It resulted in a huge cap hit, but without time travel it was unavoidable.

Seeing the production we have seen out of Byrd I wish that move was never made. It had the potential of being another Darren Sharper sort of impact but didn't pan out. Once again, too bad we can't see into the future.

Ditto with Browner.

As for Fleener, I have absolutely no issue with his acquisition. The jury is still out on that one, but I see the potential for sure.

Go back to your meds...

So. Your you either have no answer to what you would have personally done different in the Callahan case or are too lazy to do the research of the actual rules involved.

I challenged you first. If you can clearly state your case positively I will address the others.

Afraid or unable?

Guido you know I appreciate your analytical approach and your financial explanations of the way the NFL works.

However, we fans aren't paid to do Mickey Loomis' job. Nor are we paid to research available players in the draft or free agency......although we apparently do a better job than the professional talent evaluators and our GM Mickey Loomis.

Look. I've been supportive of Loomis since the day he arrived and have defended his decisions(he did help us win a Super bowl) but the dead money and piss poor talent evaluation has just about hung him and this team.

It's probably Paytons fault for trying to run the show when he's a terrible defensive evaluator. He thinks because he is so good with offense that he understands defense. He Doesn't! Someone needs to be hired to be the real GM and let Mickey count numbers which he does well. Put Sean Payton in a corner and leave him there throughout the entire draft where he can't botch the available picks.

Oh yes, Loomis deserves blame for letting Sean Payton run rough shod over him since he got here. It's a good thing they are drinking buddies. Oh wait, we've got a problem with that. Maybe that needs to be addressed too.

As soon as I get your answer on the Callahan transactions. How would you have done it any differently besides your canned response of "I wouldn't have done it."

Obviously, they saw it as a great waiver opportunity, as did the Browns. We both know having a valid commodity hit the waiver, especially at this late date, is very rare. How would you have handled the situation any differently given the rules pertaining to waiver acquisitions, practice squad eligibility and active roster limitations?