Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Martellus Bennett ... should we?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; After the Patriots won the Super Bowl, tight end Martellus Bennett noted that free agents from championship teams often receive a premium on the open market. It appears Bennett will get the chance to see if he gets that treatment ...

Like Tree13Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2017, 03:35 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 36,861
Blog Entries: 29
Martellus Bennett ... should we?

After the Patriots won the Super Bowl, tight end Martellus Bennett noted that free agents from championship teams often receive a premium on the open market.

It appears Bennett will get the chance to see if he gets that treatment next month. Ian Rapoport of NFL Media reports that Bennett will not sign a new deal with the Patriots ahead of the start of the new league year. That doesn’t preclude a return to the Patriots and Bennett fit well with the team, but the chances that someone on the open market will bowl him over are great enough that Rapoport believes it will be hard to keep him in New England.

read more

Maybe we should...
SmashMouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 03:59 PM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,494
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

Neaux
saintsfan1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 04:03 PM   #3
The Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,647
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

Hmm. Does he rush the passer? Does he defense passes and make interceptions in the secondary? Does he stop running backs in the hole? Does he cover tight ends?

Since the answer to all of these questions are "No and Hell No!" then why are we having this discussion?

The only offensive position that needs to be solidified in guard. It's a waste of time to discuss anything else on the offensive side of the ball.

SFIAH
SaintFanInATLHELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 04:04 PM   #4
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 23,951
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

SaintFanInATLHELL and neugey like this.
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 04:16 PM   #5
Hu Dat!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,586
Blog Entries: 13
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

His best days are probably behind him and probably won't be worth the price tag
neugey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 05:59 PM   #6
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,530
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

He's a "me first" guy. He was an ******* in Chicago and was kicked out of practice for attitude issues. No ****ing way.
hagan714 and 44Champs like this.
jnormand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 06:31 AM   #7
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

he is a bit of a head case. he did what the pats brought him in to do in 2016. his reward was the ring not an over blown contract.

love ya and thank you but you ain't worth all that so getting a possible comp works for us. see ya

this is SOP for the pats.
hagan714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 07:01 AM   #8
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,838
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

We should have kept Ben Watson, at 38 years old he's 100 times better than Fleener.
jeanpierre and gulfgambler like this.
dizzle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 01:57 PM   #9
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

No ****ing way.
jeanpierre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017, 03:19 PM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
Re: Martellus Bennett ... should we?

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo way
blackangold is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/81622-martellus-bennett-should-we.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 02-22-2017 03:41 PM 6
Martellus Bennett ... should we? This thread Refback 02-22-2017 03:39 PM 2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts