Another guy we can hang...

saintfan · 04-23-2010, 07:51 PM

Originally Posted by st thomas

it doe'snt mean he got off free he'll be dealt with like ben and get punnished, talking about foster. now your bringing in lacross players. lets stay in the nfl please. and you won't because goodel is the jury and judge. i'm staying in the nfl bro i've asked us to hang there, u keep saying my standard, its the nfl standard and u can't accept it. i'm really worn out bro lets move on please, high five. lol i have not typed this much in 30 years.

I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious.

st thomas · 04-23-2010, 08:05 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious.

o" i'm sorry i really don't know squat about foster case. i'm guilty o.k. . it seems to me that this has become personal to you and no one else because we are the lone occupants of this thread, i am not asking to be excused, i am done with you and your opinion on the matter, i gave you mine and we don't have to agree. so saintfan good luck bro your on your own.

saintfan · 04-23-2010, 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by st thomas

o" i'm sorry i really don't know squat about foster case. i'm guilty o.k. . it seems to me that this has become personal to you

I was asking legitimate questions. We're back to sarcasm. It does appear to have become personal, and perhaps I've struck a nerve, but it isn't personal on my part. I didn't ask you to post in this thread. You did that on your own. Bring something to the conversation next time...I guess...I mean I know you have an opinion, but we were not able to establish why. Oh well...

04-23-2010, 07:51 PM	#1
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Another guy we can hang... Originally Posted by st thomas it doe'snt mean he got off free he'll be dealt with like ben and get punnished, talking about foster. now your bringing in lacross players. lets stay in the nfl please. and you won't because goodel is the jury and judge. i'm staying in the nfl bro i've asked us to hang there, u keep saying my standard, its the nfl standard and u can't accept it. i'm really worn out bro lets move on please, high five. lol i have not typed this much in 30 years. I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious.
	C'mon Man...

04-23-2010, 08:05 PM	#2
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: Another guy we can hang... Originally Posted by saintfan I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious. o" i'm sorry i really don't know squat about foster case. i'm guilty o.k. . it seems to me that this has become personal to you and no one else because we are the lone occupants of this thread, i am not asking to be excused, i am done with you and your opinion on the matter, i gave you mine and we don't have to agree. so saintfan good luck bro your on your own.

04-23-2010, 09:32 PM	#3
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Another guy we can hang... Originally Posted by st thomas o" i'm sorry i really don't know squat about foster case. i'm guilty o.k. . it seems to me that this has become personal to you I was asking legitimate questions. We're back to sarcasm. It does appear to have become personal, and perhaps I've struck a nerve, but it isn't personal on my part. I didn't ask you to post in this thread. You did that on your own. Bring something to the conversation next time...I guess...I mean I know you have an opinion, but we were not able to establish why. Oh well...