Another guy we can hang...

saintfan · 04-23-2010, 07:51 PM

Originally Posted by st thomas

it doe'snt mean he got off free he'll be dealt with like ben and get punnished, talking about foster. now your bringing in lacross players. lets stay in the nfl please. and you won't because goodel is the jury and judge. i'm staying in the nfl bro i've asked us to hang there, u keep saying my standard, its the nfl standard and u can't accept it. i'm really worn out bro lets move on please, high five. lol i have not typed this much in 30 years.

I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious.

04-23-2010, 07:51 PM	#22
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Another guy we can hang... Originally Posted by st thomas it doe'snt mean he got off free he'll be dealt with like ben and get punnished, talking about foster. now your bringing in lacross players. lets stay in the nfl please. and you won't because goodel is the jury and judge. i'm staying in the nfl bro i've asked us to hang there, u keep saying my standard, its the nfl standard and u can't accept it. i'm really worn out bro lets move on please, high five. lol i have not typed this much in 30 years. I'm not staying in the NFL because the NFL isn't my point. It has never been my point. The Lacross players are a perfect example of my point. You say they are guilty, either because they were accused or because they settled. I am saying being accused or settling a civil suite is not evidence of guilt, neither by law or in the NFL. I completely accept the NFL standard, which is why I said I agree 100% with the decision the commish made, but even HE won't suspend a player based on accusation alone. Rather, he reviews the evidence, which you haven't done in Foster's case yet you are prepared to levy the same punishment on him that Ben received - even before you've heard the evidence. Tell me, what do you know about the Foster case, in detail? Even the "No Fun League" is more cautious.
	C'mon Man...