|
this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; How in the hell did the Saints lose to these Cardinals and need OT to beat these 49ers? Those 2 loses are worse than losing to the Falcants. IMO, I think the Falcants will drop @ least two of their ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,085
|
![]()
How in the hell did the Saints lose to these Cardinals and need OT to beat these 49ers?
Those 2 loses are worse than losing to the Falcants. IMO, I think the Falcants will drop @ least two of their last 5 games. Besides losing to the Saints, the best/only teams left that could beat them are the Seahawks and potentially the Bucs. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,085
|
Thanks strato,
I disagree that the teams we lost to were more hungry. They were fortunate to catch the Saints when they weren't playing their A-game because that is the only way that Arizona and Cleveland could beat the Saints. I do agree that the Saints should have taken care of business, (and the football). |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,039
|
In those two losses we played like we ate bad Sushi.
As far as for Cleveland... We got schooled on not expecting anything but the norm. |
![]() |