|
this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; "If there were a decent amount of time left then I could see trying something like this. But there were FIVE SECONDS left. If the Bucs managed to cause a fumble and recover it, the time would have expired." The ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-18-2012, 09:55 PM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
"If there were a decent amount of time left then I could see trying something like this.
But there were FIVE SECONDS left. If the Bucs managed to cause a fumble and recover it, the time would have expired." The clock stops on a turnover. 5 seconds is enough time to fall on the football. But you're missing another possibility. Suppose they fumble the exchange and it's rolling free, and the Bucs pick it up and run for a touchdown. You still honestly believe they should just quit? You guys are arguing against probability, but maybe you should talk to the 2002 Kentucky Wildcats who lost to LSU on a 74 yard touchdown pass with 2 seconds on the clock. You never know what might happen, and if the Bucs somehow come up with the ball, they at least get the chance at a miracle. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
09-18-2012, 10:24 PM | #12 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,046
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
Originally Posted by burningmetal
If the Bucs WERE able to cause a fumble with the 5 seconds left, by the time the ball was recovered, AND the officials got it sorted out which team had recovered it, the time would have expired.
|
09-18-2012, 10:25 PM | #13 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,520
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
PLAYER SAFETY huh? BS!!!!! NFL
|
09-19-2012, 01:36 AM | #14 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
Originally Posted by burningmetal
... yeah, like there's time to "disrupt" the center-QB snap... good one. |
09-19-2012, 09:44 AM | #15 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
Probably the best thing to do is try to time the snap. Have your MLB run full speed, time the snap, jump over the center, and nail the QB right in the chest.
If your timing is off, its only a 5 yard off-sides penalty... line up and do it again, and again, and again. Its legal as long as you don't go helmet to helmet, right? |
09-19-2012, 09:57 AM | #16 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,744
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
Originally Posted by Danno
*BREAKING NEWS*
*BRAWL BREAKS OUT AT NFL GAME* *BOTH TEAMS SUSPENDED FOR THE ENTIRE SEASON* |
09-19-2012, 11:57 AM | #17 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
To me this ranks up there with Atlanta running out of the tunnel at the start of the game and running off the field into the Lions' huddle and pregame warmups, jawing at them like a bunch of goons...it's just stupid. There is a reason a fumble on that play NEVER happens in the pros, because the QB and center are not moving full speed like in other snaps, where there may be legitimate problems with the exchange. Nice try but stupid. OK Tampa we get that you are tough guys. It's in the rules, good on you. Did it work out for you? BIG FAT NFL NO. Whether it's a touchdown or a kneel down, I say act like you've been there before. This coach thinks he is still at Rutgers.
|
09-19-2012, 12:43 PM | #18 |
500th Post
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hub City
Posts: 576
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
I really don't much agree with Jerry Jones, but he suggested doing away with kneeling the ball altogether, and I kinda don't hate that idea.
Now there are all kinds of reasons why it'll never happen, but it would create a lot more of those 'miracle' situations if, say in a close game, the team with the lead had the ball as the clock was winding down and HAD to run some sort of play that attempted to advance the ball. Then playing to the end of the game takes on a whole new meaning |
09-19-2012, 02:10 PM | #19 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
I always wanted to see somebody try the last play where instead of taking a knee in the victory formation, they hand off to their most sure-handed back, who then turns and runs the other direction, circling around the field like a chicken with his head cut off, losing yardage and running away from the defense in "Football Follies" style play, just to run more time off the clock. Like you'd start out at midfield and end up with him zig zagging around and flopping down at the 5 yard line. It would play hell with the stats in fantasy, tho.
|
09-19-2012, 02:58 PM | #20 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy
Originally Posted by Shoe.
If more teams follow Tampa's lead, I could see them outlawing 'the kneel' ... I don't like agreeing with Jerry Jones either.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/nfl/50313-nfl-sides-buccaneers-kneel-down-controversy.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
NFL sides with Buccaneers on kneel-down controversy | This thread | Refback | 09-17-2012 05:33 PM | 2 |