|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Boston Saint Interesting thought. Maybe it is because people are cautiously optimistic/secretly afraid of the future without Brees (post Breesian to quote Guido). I think most people (like myself) here wanted One of the quarterbacks to step ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,060
|
Re: Luke Johnson | Saints pick Jameis Winston to succeed Drew Brees as starting quarterback
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
Personally I find the fact Winston wasn’t the clear leader from the first day of camp a little frightening.![]()
He’s head and shoulders above Taysom but if you believe the reports coming out of camp he was pretty hot and cold, like he’s always been. I hope he can find consistency but those TDS he made against Jacksonville were pretty typical of him but usually they’re followed up with a couple interceptions a few series later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,674
|
Re: Luke Johnson | Saints pick Jameis Winston to succeed Drew Brees as starting quarterback
Originally Posted by The Dude
Most every QB across the league was hot and cold during early training camp. It's pretty much par for the course. And don't forget, Winston is in a completely different sort of offense and he also has a completely different frame of mind. I do not expect turnovers to be an issue at all.![]()
As for being a clear leader, that depends upon point of view. I feel Payton knew exactly who was the clear leader even though Hill was given every possible chance. Besides, Hill is quite capable of starting in the NFL. They both looked good overall. I don't see him being anywhere near as effective as Winston, however. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |