|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I too was hoping Verity would become the Saints kicker, but after looking at his college stats I am not so sure: https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb...-verity-1.html...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-06-2021, 04:29 PM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,729
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
I too was hoping Verity would become the Saints kicker, but after looking at his college stats I am not so sure:
https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb...-verity-1.html |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-06-2021, 04:29 PM | #12 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
6 - 7 extra points. 4-5 FG attempts. Is that not consistent? He couldn't be any worse than the Cody or the dude we just cut. You can only do so much when Tucker is getting all the reps at practice. Nonetheless, Verity is a damn good kicker & sure as hell got my attention in the preseason and also against playing us (53 yarder). Pre-season is for evaluation right? "The only difference between a 1st rounder and an undrafted player is an opportunity". Tom Brady The Saints aren't good enough to get by right now. We need all of the points we can get. |
10-06-2021, 04:51 PM | #13 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,358
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
Isn't Parkey the guy who played for the Browns in 2018 and could have beat us, had he not missed 3 or 4 FG's?
I'd rather Taysom kick if so -_- |
10-06-2021, 04:58 PM | #14 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,274
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
Originally Posted by K Major
In preseason against backup special teamers ... nothing there to get excited about. He kicked a 53 yard meaningless FG against us in preseason. Once again, if he was all that then why hasn't any of the other 31 teams picked him up off the PS?
As Matthew pointed out, Verity was only 14-21 in FG attempts his senior year at East Carolina. 74-98 his entire career. He was no more than average at a small school. What's the hype? |
10-06-2021, 05:21 PM | #15 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,687
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
|
10-06-2021, 05:23 PM | #16 |
100% Blunt
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Saint Gabriel, La
Posts: 2,754
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
|
10-07-2021, 01:34 AM | #17 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 7,113
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
Doesn't matter now we got Perky Parkey kicking for us until Lutz gets back. Rosas just wasn't getting it done so on we go.
|
10-07-2021, 04:43 AM | #18 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,358
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
|
10-07-2021, 11:48 AM | #19 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,457
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
A week late.
|
10-07-2021, 12:20 PM | #20 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,274
|
Re: Saints release Aldrick Rosas, agree to terms with Cody Parkey
One more note on the PK Verity. I remember hearing the former Bucs GM, Mark Dominik, talking about the importance of maintaining good relations with fellow GM's around the league. It had to do with snatching players either while being released for an in season move to the practice squad or signing off of the practice squad. While it is well within the rules it could hamper future dealings with the other team's management. He said something about weighing the benefits against the clear drawback.
That got me thinking about the situation with Verity. Practice squad players hold more value to a team than does a free agent, of course. They likely have a greater value to most other teams, as well. This coupled with a rule that requires paying three weeks of the players salary if claimed off of another team's practice squad, regardless of whether they remain on the acquiring team's roster for less time than that or not, could be problematic. This would render a practice squad player a poor candidate for a very short term active roster pickup. First off you would be burning a minimum of three times the rookie base salary for a single week's usage against your cap. Secondly, you can be assured that any move to demote the player to your own practice squad to get future value would fail as they would surely be snatched back up by some other club via waivers for their own practice squad. Would this be worth the cost of the move and the possibility of pissing off a fellow GM in addition? I feel this type of move might be worth it for a player that is likely to remain on the acquiring team's roster for an extended period, but a free agent would be more logical for short term usage with only a game to game obligation in regards to both cap and business relations. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|